Media News

IA's Dominique Grubisa investigation hits the mainstream

By | | comments |
DG Institute's Dominique Grubisa (Image screenshot A Current Affair)

The mainstream media have picked up yet another IA investigation — proving yet again that IA is the best in the business at bringing down the baddies.

INDEPENDENT AUSTRALIA has been the home of tenacious, long-running investigations into public wickedness for over ten years. But unlike the many others who boast about being the best in this field, IA almost always get its man — or woman, as the case may be.

And so it was again this week, on Monday night, when Channel Nine’s A Current Affair aired a damning exposé on dodgy Sydney solicitor and property advice “maven” Dominique Grubisa. As you will know, the aptly named Grubisa has been under investigation by Independent Australia for over a year.

IA was attracted to this story was the amount of work done by several reputable legal professionals, many pro bono, into the allegedly fraudulent activities of an officer of the court. Activities that had led to loss and pain by many decent people, which was seemingly being ignored by the authorities. The latter issue, public maladministration and corruption, has been a recurrent topic in IA reportage over the years, as you will read later in this piece.

The fact Grubisa was being lauded in the mainstream media as a success story was also a significant inducement to investigate. A deciding to investigate is no small decision for a small independent news outlet, because choosing to undertake a potentially years long investigation entails a major investment of time and resources, representing a significant business risk, both legal and financial.

Our first story on this topic, called ‘Real Estate Rescue's Dominique Grubisa: The dame selling distress’ was published on 5 August 2020. It gave Grubisa’s background and gave a broad overview of her questionable activities, lack of interest in such by relevant authorities and the criminal background of some of her team.

This was probably the first negative article Grubisa had ever received in the serious news media and so it wasn’t entirely unexpected, when she responded forcibly on the very day of publication. The threatening letter from Mrs Grubisa’s lawyers expressed a great deal of outrage, but did not detail anything we had said that was actually incorrect or malicious. It demanded, amongst other things, we remove the article, publish a full apology and retraction and pay for her lawyers. 

After sternly rebuffing this crude attempt at intimidation, IA followed this article with another, ‘Catfishing with Dominique Grubisa: The DG Institute’s fake reviews’, on 28 October the same year.

A month after that, on 20 November 2020, Gold Walkley Award-winning investigative journalist at The Age, Richard Baker published his first illuminating article on Grubisa's antics: Property spruiker allegedly told students to use Family Court to pinpoint targets’.

Richard Baker has since penned three more important contributions on Grubisa's allegedly predatory behaviour in The Age:

Independent Australia has in the same time, however, published no less than six more artfully written and intricately researched investigative pieces about this alleged fraudster:

Interestingly, the title phrase in the most recent IA story, "How does she sleep" was also used by one of Dominique Grubisa’s alleged victims on Monday’s A Current Affair.

Not too soundly if Independent Australia continues to get its man ‒ or in this case, woman ‒ as it has done so many times before.

This is only half the story! You may read the full version of this article, including IA’s outstanding record of its investigations holding bad guys ‒ and gals ‒ to account, in the IA members-only area. 

Follow Independent Australia on Twitter @independentaus and on Facebook HERE.

Support independent journalism Subscribe to IA.

Related Articles

 
Recent articles by David Donovan
EXCLUSIVE: GC CEO secretively pushes through Tate pods development twice rejected by Council

A development financially benefitting Gold Coast Mayor Tom Tate and twice rejected ...  
EXCLUSIVE SUMMARY: Tom Tate and his Baker's pods collapse GC democracy

Despite the Gold Coast City Council twice voting to reject a development proposal ...  
EXCLUSIVE: GC CEO secretly pushes through Tate development twice rejected by Council

A development twice rejected by elected councillors was quietly resurrected through ...  
Join the conversation
comments powered by Disqus

Support Fearless Journalism

If you got something from this article, please consider making a one-off donation to support fearless journalism.

Single Donation

$

Save IA

It’s never been more important to help Independent Australia survive!

Fearless news publication IA has exposed deep-rooted secrets other media routinely ignored. Standing up to bullies and telling the truth — that’s our speciality. As misinformation and disinformation become the norm, credible, independent journalism has never been more important.

We need to raise $60,000 to help us continue our powerful publication into 2026. If you value what we do, please donate now.