War tourism and properly honouring the sacrificed

By | | comments |
Tyne Cot cemetery, Belgium (Image by author, Dec 2013)

WAR TOURISM is going to be big business over the next few years, as we commemorate the centenary of World War I and Australia’s part in it.

Already, you can sign up for Gallipoli cruises in 2015, perhaps one escorted by an admiral and a general. If you miss out on the ballot for places at the Gallipoli Dawn Service, you can settle for Camp Gallipoli at various racecourses around Australia, including a souvenir swag for $275.

Battlefields and war cemeteries are not places I have visited often nor much like.

I remember seeing on a back road in California in 1985 a battered sign commemorating the last stand of the local Native American tribe. Small recognition. Then there was the Little Big Horn and doing what Custer failed to do in 1876, which was look over the brow of the hill to see what was coming at him.

My daughter visited Gallipoli in 2008 and thought it beautiful but not particularly sacred. Some Kiwis (Bintang Beer shirts and flip-flops) doing a haka at full tongue did not help the ambience.

I may get to Gallipoli eventually myself to see where two great-uncles were fatally wounded, one swimming in Anzac Cove, the other throwing bombs back alongside Throssell, VC and later suicide. This great-uncle got gangrene and a burial at sea.

I saw parts of Vietnam in 2009 but missed Long Tan.

On the way, I stopped in Singapore and took a taxi up into Johor to visit the place (within a kilometre or so, anyway) where my uncle died and was buried in May 1943 at the end of his own private fight against disease and terror behind Japanese lines.

His only “real” battle was with the 2/29th battalion fighting the Japanese at Muar River in January 1942. (Three hundred Australians killed in a day, about 14 times as many as at Long Tan. Seventy-two years ago today, as I write this.) This uncle’s name is high on a wall at Kranji War Cemetery, Singapore, as gravestones stretch down the green hill back towards the Besser brick entrance and the Singapore racecourse.

Given this limited experience, I had no benchmark against which to compare the killing fields of the Ypres salient, along with the nearby Tyne Cot cemetery, when I visited Flanders late last year. (Strange how closely the cemetery’s name resembles Tarin Kowt, the dusty base in Afghanistan, the latest name to be etched in what our Prime Ministers like to describe as “the Anzac tradition of arms”.)

The rows of headstones at Tyne Cot today call to mind Alexander Gardner’s photograph of Confederate dead at Antietam during the American Civil War, bodies neatly lined up ready for burial. Bloody slaughter and mangling is followed by tidying up is followed by interment in geometric rows.

Says the Department of Veterans’ Affairs:

‘In line with the principles of equality and uniformity that govern official commemoration, headstones and plaques commemorating our war dead are uniform in design and in the information they contain.’

But the headstones do show rank; perhaps the uniformity was more for the convenience of the stone mason during a war where 60 000 died. There was certainly uniformity in the cause of death: died doing his government’s business; deceased On His Majesty’s Service.

There are 1,369 Australians at Tyne Cot (791 unidentified) out of 11,956 (8,369 unidentified), making it the largest gathering of dead Commonwealth soldiers in the world and the largest gathering of dead Australian soldiers as well. There are also four dead Germans.

The Australian headstones carry name, unit, rank, dates and a Twitter-like quota (66 characters including spaces) of commemorative sentiment chosen by a family who would never see their son or sibling again. Or ‘Known unto God’ for the unidentified, which is not so much sad as inconclusive, like ticking a residual box on an official form.

Around Tyne Cot, the sites of the three battles of Ypres, including Passchendaele, have reverted long ago to their pre-1914 state, apart from the presence of tons of rusting shells and grenades, still regularly unearthed, and tens of thousands of bodies, resting beneath the blue clay and occasionally dug up and buried with appropriate honours. These continual reminders of war made our Belgian guide wary of commemoration spilling over into celebration, as threatens to happen over the next few years in both Europe and Australia.

The saddest dead are the German schoolboys at Langemarck, rushed untrained into the war in its early days, now buried in thousands in a mass grave and rarely visited by their countrymen. Losing is not good for battlefield tourism.

On the early December day when we visited, fog gave way to wintry sunlight just as we reached Tyne Cot.

Around about, we could see acres of brussels sprouts for export alternating with muddy fields of maize stubble, the crop having been harvested for stock. There was just enough mud to hint at what it was like in those wartime winters. On land so flat that an elevation of a dozen feet counts as a ridge, the stocky farmhouses looked prosperous — some of them equipped with solar panels. Neatness, efficiency and profit margin prevailed where once there had been senseless carnage.

The graves at Tyne Cot are beautifully looked after, even in early winter, long after most of the rose petals have fallen and blown away, or been individually raked up by the gardeners, for all I know. It’s that sort of place.

But it is impossible to begrudge these dead men such small attentions. Not “fallen”, please, but “dead”, “killed”, “sacrificed” rather than “making the supreme sacrifice”. It is difficult to see how that last convenient formulation in particular fits the circumstances of men under orders. (“Please, Colonel, I’d rather not make the supreme sacrifice.”)

The care these men receive now has to make up for the lives they did not lead, the marriages they did not consummate, the children they did not have, the parents they did not see again and the goals they did not reach. Some of them were heroes but all of them were victims, victims ultimately of governments pursuing geopolitical calculations.

Let the petals fall and be picked up, every single one.

David Stephens is secretary of Honest History, a coalition of historians and others supporting the balanced and honest presentation and use of Australian history during the centenary of World War I. An earlier version of this piece appeared on honesthistory.net.au, although it does not necessarily represent the views of all supporters of Honest History. Follow Honest History on Twitter @honesthistory1.

Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Australia License

Support independent journalism Subscribe to IA.

Join Newsletter

Please fill the text in this image in the field below to assist us in eliminating spam

Recent articles by David Stephens
A truth-telling War Memorial does not need 2.5 hectares of extra floor space

Money spent on a proposed extension to the Australian War Memorial should be ...  
Lest We Forget Yassmin Abdel-Magied

Two years ago Yassmin Abdel-Magied got herself into trouble for saying ‘Lest. ...  
Lest we forget, again, our violent frontier past

Anzac Day is an opportunity to confront our violent frontier past and its shadow ...  
Join the conversation
comments powered by Disqus

Support IAIndependent Australia

Subscribe to IA and investigate Australia today.

Close Subscribe Donate