Members Only Editorial

EDITORIAL — The Lattouf trial: A question of bias at the ABC

By | | comments |
(Image by Dan Jensen)

It says a lot about the state of our Fourth Estate when the publicly-funded national broadcaster stands accused of terminating a journalist because of their race and political opinions.

It reveals much about the inadequacy of Australia’s employee protections.

It also says a lot about the parlous state of our democratic freedoms.

Perhaps most telling of the expendability of employees and the blatant lack of concern lurking under the surface of our cultural institutions is when the head of the national broadcaster thinks it reasonable to send an email to colleagues wishing for an employee to “get COVID”.

At the very least, something is drastically wrong with the upper echelons of the ABC, as this emailed message to colleagues from then-ABC chair Ita Buttrose demonstrates:

‘Has Antoinette [Lattouf] been replaced? I'm over getting emails about her … I have a whole clutch more complaints. Why can't she come down with flu or COVID or a stomach upset? We owe her nothing.’

Lattouf, who is of Arab descent, believes she was sacked from her role as an ABC radio presenter because of her race and the fact that she publicly opposed Israel's military campaign in Gaza.

She is suing the public broadcaster for unfair dismissal, and whether or not her race was a factor in the termination of Lattouf’s employment will now be determined by the Federal Court.

Certainly, the fact that she shared on social media a Human Rights Watch (HRW) report, which alleged Israel was using starvation as a weapon of war – a report about which the ABC had previously published two news items – was put forward as the reason her services were no longer required by ABC management.

Lattouf says she was planning the next day’s episode with the program team when she was called into a meeting for a “quick chat” by ABC Radio Sydney manager, Steve Ahern.

Ahern then advised that she would not be presenting the next day because her social media post:

“…Called into question the ABC’s impartiality.”

Ahern added:

“You can return to your desk, get your bag and leave.”

The ABC denies Antoinette Lattouf was “sacked”, despite being taken off the air before completing her stint on ABC Radio Sydney, because she was paid for the five days of her contract.

According to the ABC, Lattouf’s posts were considered “provocative” and indicative of bias, and constituted a breach of her employment contract.

However, Lattouf's barrister Oshie Fagir told the court that acting editorial director Simon Melkman, after assessing the social media activity in question, advised that "she [had] done nothing wrong” and told Lattouf:

“ … I've not identified any breach of our personal use of social media guidelines, no breach of our editorial protocols or the Act."

Although the ABC has also denied any influence from outside lobbyists over the decision to fire Lattouf, as previously reported by IA, a series of messages were sent directly to ABC chair Ita Buttrose and managing director, David Anderson.

The texts indicated pro-Israeli lobbyists, Lawyers for Israel, had launched a coordinated campaign, threatening legal action if Lattouf wasn't fired.

Apart from Ita Buttrose’s choice comments above, the court has heard ABC managing director David Anderson personally reviewed Ms Lattouf's social media accounts and sent text messages to outgoing chief content officer, Chris Oliver-Taylor,  including the following:

‘I think we have an Antoinette issue’ and ’her socials are full of antisemitic hatred.’

Barrister Oshie Fagir questioned David Anderson today in court on the usual process for making decisions on issues of impartiality and whether standards are breached:

“Is there some formal process, or is it an ad hoc response each time?”

Anderson replied there was a formal process by which impartiality is determined, including allegations being put to staff and an ensuing investigation. This is the "usual process", Anderson said, before admitting that this process did not appear to have been followed in Lattouf’s case.

Anderson said:

“That investigation is usually done by, or can be done by, somebody in the employee relations team and People and Culture. Advice is provided to the delegate for the decision, depending on the staff member; it depends where the delegate sits, as far as the decision maker.”

Fagir then asked Anderson:

“Was the process you’ve just described followed in relation to Ms Lattouf?”

Anderson replied: 

“I don’t believe so.”

Fagir also raised several other ABC employees who had been accused of bias, such as Laura Tingle, who had previously been “sanctioned” but not removed from the air:

 “Ms Lattouf can’t make a public statement which is not impartial, but Laura Tingle can: that’s the fact of the matter, isn’t it?”

Anderson replied:

“It was a different matter and that was dealt with at the time.”

Back in 2022, ABC presenter Fauziah Ibrahim took a temporary break from on-camera duties following public criticism for compiling public Twitter lists labelling ALP supporters as “lobotomised shitheads”. She returned to her duties a short while later.

Of course, we can't be sure but it appears no one sent emails hoping Ibrahim would contract COVID.

But then, Ibrahim had not criticised Israel or mentioned genocide.

On the question of bias, Lattouf was asked in court about a social media post that said, 'Gaza is being annihilated hourly', to which Lattouf responded: 

"I don't think facts are controversial."

Certainly, the pro-Israeli lobby is active in its attempts to have journalists silenced, as the current case brought against Mary Kostakidis by the Zionist Federation of Australia and the sacking of cricket commentator Peter Lalor also demonstrate.

Whatever the outcome of the unfair dismissal case brought by Antoinette Lattouf against the ABC currently playing out in the Federal Court, the fallout for the national broadcaster and whether it can be trusted as a fair employer or indeed, a credible news source, will be considerable.

The Federal Court proceedings of Antoinette Lattouf v Australian Broadcasting Corporation may be viewed here.

Follow managing editor Michelle Pini on Bluesky @michellepini.bsky.social and Independent Australia on Bluesky @independentaus.bsky.social.

 
Recent articles by Michelle Pini
AFR-king what!? Mad money mag grovels to Gina, bootlicks billionaires and promotes plutocracy

‘Billionaire barons have every right to use their money to influence us’ ...  
EDITORIAL: AFR urges Aussies to submit to Gina the Great and our gilded digger-barons

Written in response to an AFR team editorial, by the IA editorial team, which may ...  
Independents now partying: Why a new party will likely be just another party

Managing editor Michelle Pini discusses the prospect of the Teal Independents ...  
Join the conversation
comments powered by Disqus

Support Fearless Journalism

If you got something from this article, please consider making a one-off donation to support fearless journalism.

Single Donation

$

Support IAIndependent Australia

Subscribe to IA and investigate Australia today.

Close Subscribe Donate