Let's include the Queen in the new Australian Republic

By | | comments |

Former Ambassador and Howard Government minister Amanda Vanstone believes we shouldn’t wait to become a Republic until the Queen dies. Senior correspondent Barry Everingham agrees.

Amanda Vanstone says a Republic should acknowledge and involve the Queen as a sign of respect

Amanda Vanstone always said what she thought when she was in the Senate, and as our country’s ambassador in Rome the strictures of diplomacy didn’t get in her way either.

A long time committed Republican, Amanda believes we shouldn’t wait to change the Constitution until the Queen dies — claiming Elizabeth isn’t offended by the R word. I’m convinced the former senator is making the correct assumption.

It is something our head of state has on a few occasions publicly stated.

In her 2002 visit, she pointedly said the way Australia develops over the next 50 years “is in yours hands”.

And, to make her point clear, she went on to say that whatever may lie ahead we (Australians) would have her, admiration, affection and regard.

Amanda put her case succinctly, sensibly and patriotically.

Let me quote Vanstone from the Sydney Morning Herald and The Melbourne Age:
I want us to become a republic because I want our constitutional arrangements to be Australian. My motivation is to strengthen our Australian identity.
She continues:
Bringing an end to the Windsor family reigning as monarchs over us is a consequence, not a motivation.
Then she hits the nail firmly on the head:
Remember when Cathy Freeman won the 400-metre race in the 2000 Sydney Olympics? The bronze was won by Katherine Merry from Britain. Many of us were hyped up before the race. Inexplicably perhaps, but it meant a lot for us. We were cheering not just for us, our team, but for Cathy. Was our Queen?

Vanstone believes that many Australians respect and admire the Queen and by putting forward  a timetable for us to become a republic while she is still alive means she is not being treated “…like some demented old aunt in the corner of the room, in front of whom we whisper, without including her in what's going on”.

“She knows”, said Vanstone, “that history means change”.

The former senator and ambassador has come up with a superb scenario and it goes as follows:

We should be looking for ways in the process of change to acknowledge her majesty as our monarch and to include her.
She says it is not by stifling the debate in front of her that we demonstrate how stable, free and robust our current system is.

The Queen could, says Vanstone as an example, open a special sitting of Parliament to consider referendum bill. She says that if what she thinks is inevitable happens, there could be some sort of ceremonial handover.
That’s when the PM of the day could make the speech of the century. A grateful nation could put on record its affection and gratitude.
In sharing this with our readers I’m hoping the monarchist’s spokesman will spare us the spleen, invective, spin and feline raging which underscores anything to do with even the mention of the “R” word.

(No need to whisper, the Queen isn’t offended by the R-word; by Amanda Vanstone; The Age & SMH – March 28, 2111)

Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Australia License  
Recent articles by Barry Everingham
Strewth, Turnbull the Placebo Flamingo of Australian politics! Who knew?

Where's Malcolm Turnbull's ticker? Time for him to be a leader and deal with Abbott ...  
Dyson Heydon, #BorderFarce and Captain Abbott's last days in the Lodge

With the Dyson Heydon debacle and the Border Force farce, Team Australia Captain ...  
Barry Everingham: Support fearless independent journalism

Senior correspondent Barry Everingham says IA should be supported, because it has ...  
Join the conversation
comments powered by Disqus

Support IAIndependent Australia

Subscribe to IA and investigate Australia today.

Close Subscribe Donate