As a shift in Australia's political system seems possible, a new government is a necessary change. Kim Wingerei examines what needs to be done in order to make the change a successful one.
AS WE DECRY what many say is the most incompetent government in living memory, it's important not to fall into the trap of just waiting for it to be replaced, thinking all will be well henceforth. We need to look at how to avoid Australia ever having to experience this kind of dysfunction again. Just electing another party is not enough.
Important as it is, setting up a Federal ICAC is dealing with the symptoms of a flawed system, not the root cause. Tinkering around the edges of donation regulation won't change how vested interests have far too much influence over policy, nor will enforcing and strengthening the largely ignored rules for lobbyists' behaviour.
A Labor-led Government will reverse some of the worst excesses of the ATM gang, direct more of our collective wealth towards those in need and to the education sector, maybe even bring common sense back into our foreign policy. It will (hopefully) be brave enough to recognise the folly of turning back boats as a substitute for humane treatment of desperate refugees and no doubt introduce real policies to help combat the effects of climate change.
Bill Shorten has pledged his support for the process towards finally removing our colonial shackles with our own Head of State, and pursuing an Indigenous voice in parliament, although we have yet to see how.
A fair and inclusive voice to Australia's first immigrants is fundamental. Dividing communities by asserting greater rights on the basis of arrival time, implied status & non-inclusive language is clearly a problem for Australia's first settlers. A bill of rights is a way forward— Siegfried Angerer (@seaprod100) November 27, 2018
The latter two will require constitutional changes. Ideally, so would the much-needed introduction of a Bill of Rights, although (as former Human Rights Commissioner Gillian Triggs has pointed out) a bill protecting our basic rights to freedom of speech, the right to a fair trial, freedom from discrimination, equal right to education, protection of privacy and so forth – rights most of us take for granted – can be enacted by itself. At least as a starting point leading to it eventually being enshrined in a reformed Constitution.
As Triggs points out, Australia is the only “proper” democracy that doesn't have a Bill of Rights.
We live in a world where democracy is under threat from elected leaders with disdain for the institutions of democracy, which makes it even more important to formalise our assumed rights. Australia is now only one of 19 countries ranked as “true” democracies by the Economist's Democracy Index published earlier this year.
The latest edition of the index records the worst decline in global democracy for almost a decade. The United States is not among the 19 but on a list of flawed democracies, mainly due to the low voter participation rate. And although our mandatory voting system holds us in good stead on that score, we have no reason to be complacent.
The “Witness K” case shows that our government (unopposed by Labor) can flout the basic rights of the people to hold it to account. The“it's okay to be white” stunt in the Senate proves we have elected representatives failing to understand what's at stake. Press freedoms are under threat by draconian laws limiting reporting from the refugee camps and Peter Dutton is working to broaden State surveillance, threatening privacy.
And as religion makes a return to the political debate, tolerance for those with a different view to our own continues its decline towards an ever-increasing polarisation.
Religious freedom – and its logical antithesis, freedom from religion – are the only rights specifically mentioned in our constitution (Section 116). Much to the chagrin of those calling for the “right” of religious education in State schools (as long as it is their particular brand of religion, of course).
Australia isn't a strictly secular state like France. However, section 116 of the constitution prevents the federal govt establishing a state church. All religions are allowed in the public space. You can be a Pastafarian if you wish. #thedrum #auspol https://t.co/SjEmdveJtg— David Marler (@Qldaah) October 30, 2018
I have no problem with school children learning about the world's many religions and their often violent history, but I would also love to see our children be taught the ideas of ethical behaviour from a humanistic perspective, free of religious dogma.
But, more importantly, I want to see our elected representatives and those chosen for executive government to adhere to basic ethical principles.
“Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do and what is right to do.”
When the venerable Tony Fitzgerald (he of the Fitzgerald Inquiry) and the Australian Institute put these seven basic questions of ethics to our parliamentarians in June 2017, 36 declined to take part and 137 did not reply. Less than one-quarter of our federal politicians – including 39 from the ALP, an encouraging sign – were prepared to commit to these fairly self-evident standards of conduct:
- to act honourably and fairly and solely in the public interest;
- to treat all citizens equally;
- to tell the truth;
- not to mislead or deceive;
- not to withhold or obfuscate information to which voters are entitled;
- not to spend public money except for public benefit; and
- not to use your position or information gained from your position for your benefit or the benefit of a family member, friend, political party or other related entity.
Reforming our democracy will be a long and arduous process. Changing current conventions is hard enough and will be met with intense resistance from those with a vested interest in the status quo. Constitutional changes are even harder.
But all change starts with small steps. Demanding that those wanting to represent us in parliament are prepared to sign up to a set of self-evident standards of ethical behaviour to be elected – and turn away from those that won't – is one such small step.
Not only that, it's a small step that doesn't require changes to law, regulations, party programs, statutes or ballot papers. All it requires is consent by individuals of their free will in their own self-interest.
Labor and crossbench to test Morrison’s minority government with federal Icac vote https://t.co/hdEttpjsCp— Guardian Australia (@GuardianAus) November 25, 2018
The gun lobby #SIFA is urging voters to put Labor last. They must expect a @MatthewGuyMP led @LiberalVictoria government to make guns easier to acquire. Imagine the #BourkeSt nutter with a gun instead of a knife. Vote Labor to keep guns off our streets. #auspol #VicVotes— John Wren, Democratic Peoples Republic of Victoria (@JohnWren1950) November 21, 2018
Support independent journalism Subscribe to IA.