Critics of Facebook believe its recent name change is merely a smokescreen, meant to distract us from looking at the social media giant's practices, writes Brett Wilkins.
'Changing their name doesn't change reality: Facebook is destroying our democracy and is the world's leading peddler of disinformation and hate.'
~ Real Facebook Oversight Board
Tech ethicists and branding professionals on Thursday last said consumers should not be hoodwinked by Facebook's name change, which numerous observers compared to earlier efforts by tobacco and fossil fuel companies to distract attention from their societal harms.
Facebook co-founder and chief executive officer Mark Zuckerberg announced the Meta rechristening during Facebook Connect, the company's annual virtual and augmented reality conference, explaining that:
"... we are a company that builds technology to connect people and the metaverse is the next frontier, just like social networking was when we got started."
"Some of you might be wondering why we're doing this right now. The answer is that I believe that we're put on this Earth to create. I believe that technology can make our lives better."
Many critics found Zuckerberg's explanation unconvincing at best and, at worst, disingenuous.
Said watchdog group Real Facebook Oversight Board in a statement:
'Changing their name doesn't change reality: Facebook is destroying our democracy and is the world's leading peddler of disinformation and hate. Their meaningless name change should not distract from the investigation, regulation and real, independent oversight needed to hold Facebook accountable.'
"Don't be fooled. Nothing changes here. This is just a publicity stunt hatched by Facebook's Public Relations department to deflect attention as Zuckerberg squirms [over the negative press from recent whistleblower revelations]."
Former Facebook employees-turned-whistleblowers say the company's profit-seeking algorithms – and its executives who know their insidious impacts – are responsible for the mass dissemination of harmful content, including hate speech and political, climate, and COVID-19 misinformation.
"The Facebook of today has never been the end game for Zuckerberg. He's always wanted his company to be the operating system of our lives that can socially engineer how we live and what we know."
Vaidhyanathan continued, adding that the new name is:
"... not going to change his vision for his company — he's never let anybody on the outside change his mind."
Zuckerberg, he said:
"... wants to take the dynamic of algorithmic guidance out of our phones and off of our computers and build that system into our lives and our consciousness. So our eyeglasses become our screens and our hands become the mouse."
Some observers compared Facebook's attempt to rebrand itself to what they called similar efforts by Big Tobacco and fossil fuel corporations.
There's no name that's going to rehabilitate the behaviour that they've displayed so far. Maybe put that time and energy into rehabilitating their morals and ethics and business decisions rather than just trying to slap a new name on something.
- Why I closed my Facebook account
- Michelle Pini interviewed by RTV Slovenia on Australia's Google and Facebook code
- Twin threats of Mark Zuckerberg and Josh Frydenberg damaging Australia
- Facebook is right to call the Australian Government bluff
- STUDY: Left-wing Aussies are anxious about expressing political views online
Support independent journalism Subscribe to IA.