Politics Opinion

Rare earth elements: The minerals at the heart of the next world crisis

By | | comments |
(Image via U.S. Department of Agriculture | Picryl)

As tensions rise between China and the West, rare earth elements have become the new battleground for global dominance, fuelling weapon production, environmental fallout and international power struggles, writes Melanie McCartney.

RARE EARTH ELEMENTS (REE) have become a hot topic of discussion ever since Trump 2.0 began. Even more so since China put export limits on their REE, rare earth magnets and semiconductor materials that contain 0.1% of REE.

China first discovered REE in Inner Mongolia in 1927, and they have invested heavily in the research and development of rare earth technologies since then. This is why they can successfully do large-scale processing today.

An American policy turned back on them

The export mechanism that China is using is actually an American policy called the foreign direct product rule (FDPR). America has used the FDPR as a tool to restrict the sale of Huawei products in the West and has used it to restrict semiconductor exports to China for years. America also uses it to control other transactions between other countries and China. 

China’s international obligations 

When China made its REE announcement, it explained that it has already had export controls for over 20 years. The increase of controls is to combat REE being used to make dangerous weaponry and to prevent dual use.

Dual use is when REE is used for civilian and military use. This is not just about China's national security and interests, it’s also about fulfilling its international obligations with the Treaty of Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.

There are still four countries that haven’t signed the treaty: India, Israel, Pakistan and South Sudan. Responsible oversight of the REE global supply chain is needed more than ever in these times. 

Any company affiliated with foreign militaries will be denied export licenses. China’s Ministry of Commerce said emphatically that any requests to use its REE for military reasons will be rejected. This is a major setback for America’s weapon production capabilities, especially at a time when its stockpiles are low. It’s also bad news for the artificial intelligence (AI) industry with the restrictions on semiconductors.

REE used for warmongering 

Last year, NATO published a list of critical raw materials for defence.

  1. aluminium;
  2. beryllium;
  3. cobalt;
  4. gallium;
  5. germanium;
  6. graphite;
  7. lithium;
  8. manganese;
  9. platinum;
  10. rare earth elements;
  11. titanium; and
  12. tungsten.

REE is essential for the production of military technologies such as: F-35 fighter jets, Virginia and Columbia class submarines, Tomahawk missiles, radar systems, Predator unmanned aerial vehicles and the Joint Direct Attack Munition series of smart bombs.

Australia’s role in helping America

The recent “critical mineral agreement” signed by Australia and America is not just about the supply of REE; it’s also about Australia developing a bauxite-to-gallium refining pipeline. The Pentagon is going to be funding the construction of the gallium refinery in Western Australia.

Gallium can only be produced as a byproduct of bauxite mining and Australia has the second largest reserves of bauxite, which is the main ore of aluminium. Gallium is a byproduct of aluminium. Australia has eight of the REE that NATO listed above as crucial for defence included in the recently signed agreement.

Australian Ambassador to America, Kevin Rudd, emphasised in an interview earlier this year with the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, that critical minerals are defence assets.

Rudd also said:

“Geology has been kind to us. It’s an ancient continent, it’s been worn flat, the stuff’s closer to the surface.”

First Nations People left out of the picture 

Kevin Rudd is right, Australia is an ancient continent, so shouldn’t First Nations people be part of the REE discussion? The Mirrar people fought uranium mining on their land for decades; they won their fight just last year. Traditional land owners take responsibility not just for the land, they also care about what the impacts of activities such as mining their land has on others. 

In 2011, Yvonne Margarula, of the Mirrar people, wrote a letter to UN Secretary General Ban-ki Moon, expressing her sorrow at the impacts radiation was having on the lives of Japanese people. She noted that: ‘It is likely that the radiation problems at Fukushima are, at least in part, fuelled by uranium derived from our traditional lands. This makes us feel very sad.’ 

Can China even be overtaken

Arnaud Bertrand wrote an excellent article that is worth reading. He forensically outlines the impossibility of other countries being able to catch up with China. It’s not just about building refining infrastructure to match China; there’s the specialised skills of workers to consider and intensive energy requirements. There is also the fact that a whole ecosystem and logistics network needs to be built — something that China has built for decades. 

There is also the question of purity — for REE to be viable for use, it needs to be at least 99.9%.

The dangers of extraction and radioactive waste

Australia is a large aluminium producer, which is why it has been chosen by America to refine aluminium for its byproduct, gallium. Smelting aluminium in itself is bad enough for the environment. To even get to the extraction point of gallium, you need to process alumina, then you need to refine the aluminium before you can extract the REE. 

All of these processes lead to a form of radiation called technologically enhanced naturally occurring radioactive materials (TENORM).

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency:

‘Naturally occurring radioactive materials that have been concentrated or exposed to the accessible environment as a result of human activities such as manufacturing, mineral extraction, or water processing.’

What to do with all of the excess aluminium 

As Arnaud explained, to produce 100 tonnes of gallium per year, you would need to produce 12 million tonnes of alumina and 4.7 million tonnes of aluminium. You only need a small amount of REE to produce things, but it is an extremely intensive extraction process. There is also the oversupply factor; there has been a global supply glut of aluminium for years. 

It’s not just about oil in Venezuela

It’s of note that Venezuela has not just a lot of oil, but it also has a bauxite mine and is a major producer and exporter of that mineral. Greenland has lots of REE too, but they’re extremely difficult to get to and they don’t have mines for them.

Give peace a chance

Providing REE to America for nuclear weapons to potentially use against China is an existential threat to its existence. It’s important to know that China’s export controls aren’t aimed at hurting America economically. You just have to apply for a license, letting them know what you are using REE for. If it’s for bombs and so on, they don’t want their products to be used for making them. If it’s for humanitarian reasons, no problem.

What happens next remains to be seen, but it’s nice to have some breathing room while America works out its next move. 

This article was originally published on MelMacPolitics and has been republished with permission.

You can read more from Melanie McCartney on her blog or you can follow her on Twitter @CartwheelPrint.

Support independent journalism Subscribe to IA.

 
Recent articles by Melanie McCartney
Rare earth elements: The minerals at the heart of the next world crisis

Rare earth elements have become the new battleground for global dominance, fuelling ...  
Taxpayer-funded surveillance: The Liberal Party database and i360 combine

i360 captures data from the Feedback database, operated by Parakeelia, which is ...  
Surveillance, shadow profiling and political omniscience

Melanie McCartney delves into the murky world of big data surveillance methods and ...  
Join the conversation
comments powered by Disqus

Support Fearless Journalism

If you got something from this article, please consider making a one-off donation to support fearless journalism.

Single Donation

$

Support IAIndependent Australia

Subscribe to IA and investigate Australia today.

Close Subscribe Donate