0
(Image via flickr.com/photos/whitehouse)

The leaked transcript of a phone call between Turnbull and Trump is a master class on "truthful" yet misleading media reporting, says Noely Neate.

THE LEAK of that infamous chat between Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull and the newly elected President Donald Trump has been the talk of the town and, obviously, Twitter exploded, which is always fun to watch.

If you have not read the transcript in full, I suggest you do. Amidst the frivolity of #Auspol watchers and “hot takes” from media, some very serious issues did come to light.

I don’t know about you, but I found myself wondering if many politicians and those in the media had forgotten that punters were on the interwebz too?

The Australian was first out of the blocks with a ridiculous piece from what I assume to be their U.S. correspondent, calling it 'Trump-Turnbull transcript shows call was one of PM's finest moments'

Kieran Gilbert on Sky News Australia was referring to the “robust” phone call and using hyperbole like “Turnbull's show of strength”, "strong negotiator”, “standing up to” — well, you get the gist. The Australian PM had turned into some strong hard man negotiator and we should be proud.

From what I could tell on Twitter, ABC News seemed to be following along the same lines. PM Turnbull is spinning this leaked transcript as “Australians can see I stand up for them”. Poor old Mark Kenny over at Fairfax who has given Malcolm Turnbull more starts than Phar Lap, also follows the "tough" line, though at least has the chagrin to admit to the “PM’s willingness to bend the facts in order to win” with his offering of 'Trump leak reveals Malcolm Turnbull to be tough, skilled and indifferent to human suffering'.

Again, we have to ask, "Do you people realise we are on the internet and can read the transcript for ourselves?"

We saw a discussion between two men focussed on asylum seekers whose only aim was to seek political advantage or limit political damage. "The vulnerable refugees? Myeh", seemed to be the attitude. This article in @noplaceforsheep, 'Turnbull & Trump: Masters of depravitydescribes the heartlessness well.

The fact that this has been ignored by so many media organisations is a really good example as to why we, the punters, should take everything we read or hear in the news, particularly those reports based on “sources in government” and so on, with a grain of salt.

So just how are these people spinning the "tough Turnbull" line?

One line. Just one line from Turnbull in the transcript:

'You can certainly say that it was not a deal that you would have done, but you're going to stick with it.' 

In fact, if you read the whole transcript, it is nothing like the "strong man negotiating a deal" that many would like to us to believe. Worse, some media are picking out bits of the transcript to fit their narrative, which in fact misinforms the public.

Due to the overwhelming majority of pieces in media following the PM’s “I stand up for Australia” line and “strong PM enforcing the deal” narrative being in the majority of news organisations, without that full transcript being made available by The Washington Post, we, "Joe Blow and Jill Dill" at home, would be given a skewed version of what occurred and be none the wiser about it.

I will give the PM ten points for tenacity and patience. I mean, pretty much two minutes into the conversation, Malcolm Turnbull must have been thinking“Australia relies on the United States for our International security and they are now being run by this asinine, ignorant, egotistical toddler, we are sooo screwed”. So yes, I will give Turnbull a lot of credit for holding his nerve, as surely any warning that our bureaucrats in the U.S. could have given him could not have truly prepared him for just how much of a clown the new U.S. President is.

Then again, if we are going to be handing out kudos for perseverance and patience in the face of a toddler throwing a tantrum, well, the child care teachers and parents of Australia deserve medals too.

Basically, Turnbull lied to us. In a nutshell, we were told at the time of the original phone call:

  • They discussed Syria and North Korea;
  • Even though unhappy that the Obama Administration had agreed to take refugees, Trump would still honour the deal; and
  • Us taking some refugees from the U.S. was NOT a “people swap”.

They did NOT discuss Syria and North Korea at all. Turnbull raised it at the end of the conversation in an obvious attempt to move the conversation onto other issues.

However, Trump was having none of it and the conversation wound up quickly:

TURNBULL: Do you want to talk about Syria and DPRK?
TRUMP: ... [inaudible] this is crazy.
TURNBULL: Thank you for your commitment. It is very important to us.
TRUMP: It is important to you and it is embarrassing to me. It is an embarrassment to me, but at least I got you off the hook. So you put me back on the hook.
TURNBULL: You can count on me. I will be there again and again.
TRUMP: I hope so. Okay, thank you Malcolm.
TURNBULL: Okay, thank you.
[END OF CALL]

From the start, Turnbull gives Trump an "out" on honouring his deal with Australia — though it does illustrate that the deals are "connected" which the PM and Minister for Minister for Immigration and Border Protection Peter Dutton have both denied:

TURNBULL …Yes, the agreement, which the Vice President just called the Foreign Minister about less than 24 hours ago and said your Administration would be continuing, does not require you to take 2,000 people. It does not require you to take any. It requires, in return, for us to do a number of things for the United States — this is a big deal, I think we should respect deals.

Reading the whole transcript, I really can’t see where Trump does agree to take our refugees as per the original agreement. I do see, though, where Turnbull pretty much coaches Trump as to how he can save face by agreeing to the deal but not actually honouring it by using the "vetting" excuse as a get-out-of-jail-free card — Trump's political face, that is, not our refugees getting out of jail. Turnbull then reinforces this suggestion as to how to weasel out of the 'deal'.

Turnbull tells Trump:

'You can decide to take 1,000 or 100. It is entirely up to you. The obligation is to only go through the process.'

He is basically telling old mate Donald, as long you look like you are honouring the deal, we don’t care — just go through the motions!

The conversation continues as Turnbull has to explain that the refugees are not actually criminals, though, to be fair to The Don, his limited knowledge of how we had them in detention on islands would lead you to believe they are, as that is the way we are treating our asylum seekers.

Trump finally catches on to the loophole and takes the "out" that Turnbull had already suggested to him:

TRUMP:  … I look like a dope. The only way that I can do this is to say that my predecessor made a deal and I have no option then to honor the deal. I hate having to do it, but I am still going to vet them very closely. Suppose I vet them closely and I do not take any?
TURNBULL: That is the point I have been trying to make.

Turnbull reinforces that Trump can get out of the deal — not even pretending it will be honoured? So the PM pretty much lied to the Australian people about the deal being honoured.

Let’s get back to the people swap that we were told was not a people swap — patently a lie. If you look at Turnbull’s words, he even gave Trump a way to weasel out there.

TURNBULL: …Basically, we are taking people from the previous administration that they were very keen on getting out of the United States. We will take more. We will take anyone that you want us to take.

How is this a deal? Turnbull is promising to take anyone The Don wants to send us — as long as they didn’t arrive on a boat, of course.

So to summarise, our so-called “strong Prime Minister standing up for Australia”, negotiated a stunning deal where the other party can weasel out of their side, as long as they look like they tried and we will take an unlimited amount of U.S. unwanted, whoever they may be. Yeah, great deal!

No wonder our PM can’t get anything done as a leader in this nation — he sure as hell can’t negotiate for shit.

For mine, the "hot take" from this transcript is that our Prime Minister is the ultimate political animal, happy to obfuscate with the Australian public to look good – some would go so far as to say lie – and doesn’t care less about real people, as long as he looks good politically. Or, as my grandmother would have said, “style over substance”. 

Yet, if we did not have this transcript to read for ourselves, would we be seeing this?

This whole episode has been a master class on how media can report truthfully, yet misinform or mislead at the same time. These "Turnbull is a legend" types have not lied, they are using quotes from the transcript, just omitting any that make Turnbull look soft or don’t fit their "take".

It really makes me wonder just how often we are misinformed. But apart from opinion pieces, you do tend to believe reports as even the most biased media still seem to follow that basic precept of journalism where the story needs to be based on a fact that is known.

Sadly, my "hot take" from this Trump Turnbull chat is we can’t trust vast segments of the media to inform us fully and frankly. I find that really depressing. I'm not the sort to squeal "MSM" as a pejorative and see bias around every corner. I do understand there can be some unconscious bias in the media, but overwhelmingly choose to believe they do take their role as the fourth estate seriously. I want to trust the majority of our fourth estate.

Maybe this leaked Turnbull/Trump transcript has given us the opportunity to ascertain exactly who in our media can be trusted.

We have seen that very few have reported this transcript straight down the line. I would strongly suggest to all punters out there, you ensure you subscribe to those segments of media who did report this issue seriously and factually, as we are stuffed if they fold.  

Read more from Noely Neate on her blog YaThink? or follow her on Twitter @YaThinkN.

Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Australia License

Monthly Donation

$

Single Donation

$

Support fearless independent media. Subscribe to IA for just $5.

 

Share this article:   

0

Join the conversation Comments Policy

comments powered by Disqus