Is Trump a necessary evil?

By | | comments |
(Cartoon by Mark David / @mdavidcartoons)

Trump shows us where democracy is failing, but more than that, Trump is showing all of us what we have become, writes Dr Kim Sawyer.

In a sense, every U.S. President is necessary for the times they live and the times that follow.

Certainly, that was the case for Lincoln. While his Gettysburg Address is most remembered, his Cooper Union Speech showed him to be necessary.

Lincoln concluded the Cooper Union Speech with these words:

"Let us have faith that right makes might and, in that faith, let us, to the end, dare to do our duty as we understand it."

We might ask why this has been forgotten. Perhaps Donald Trump is necessary to remind us.

Trump is necessary for three reasons:

  • first, he is necessary because of what he represents to those who voted for him; 
  • secondly, he is necessary because of the test he has imposed on democracy; and
  • thirdly, he is also necessary because he has shown us what we have become.

There is an unwritten law of politics, a variation of Newton’s Third Law that every action has an opposite and often more than equal reaction. It is why first-term governments often fail and why the most popular French president in recent times is now the least popular.

For many, Trump was a reaction to too much prescription of how to behave and how not to behave. His base voted for him because he was an "anti-politician". No politician has had a base like Trump, but his base will never support a pyramid. Trump’s base already has a wall — it is a wall of indifference to those different from them, a wall that locks in the past and locks out the future. Trump is necessary because he has revealed why they are who they are.

Trump is also necessary to show us the weakness in democracy. Possibly more legislation will flow from Trump than any other president, but not in the way he intended. No future president will be able to be like Trump. Democracy cannot afford it.

Let’s speculate about the presidency in 2040. It will be mandatory for all candidates to provide their full tax history. Executive power will be curtailed, perhaps there will even be limits on the ability to decide military incursions. The electoral system will be reformed so that the president must also win the popular vote. There may even be an independent electoral commission so congressional districts are not gerrymandered. Almost certainly, a special prosecutor will be fully protected.

Trump is necessary to show us where democracy is failing.

However, Trump is more than that. Trump is showing all of us what we have become. When we look in the mirror we do not see him but we do see some of him. Trump represents something within all of us. William Golding alluded to it in Lord of the Flies and Trump is the realisation.

Like Trump, we are all self-interested. Generations of economists have taught the maximisation of self-interest, but Trump is teaching us more. Trump is teaching how our obsession with ourselves is limiting who we can be.

Like Trump, we have never been more connected, but never more disconnected from the person sitting next to us on the train. A President home alone at Christmas tweeting from the White House is showing the level of our disconnection. We are addicted to brevity, where the text message has replaced the conversation. We are reading less of more. And through his tweets, Trump amplifies the problem.

Like Trump, our lives are punctuated by too much uncertainty. Even at Christmas, the stock market is unforgiving. General Kelly and General Mattis hedged the risk, but now they too have gone. We are discovering that not every risk can be hedged.

Like Trump, we seem to accept everything has a price. Trump has lived a life of transactions where even morality has a price. He paid a price to become President. We are paying the price because he hid the transaction. We are learning the cost of the deal.

Like Trump, we have a selective memory. We are more confident than we should be and too proud to regret. Trump is more selective than most of us. Yet he reminds us of our own selectivity.

In his Cooper Union Speech, Lincoln dared us to do our duty. The Trump Presidency has dared us more than most. Duty is an ambiguous term. We must always ask, to what or to whom we have a duty. We all have a duty to family and friends, but we also have a duty to random strangers, to other species, and to the planet. With more obligations, we trade off duties.

Trump has lived a life of avoidance of duty — not just avoidance of military service and avoidance of taxes, but also the avoidance of duty to others, whether on the other side of a transaction or the other side of the street. Many of those who have served in the Trump Administration have cited a duty to country, rather than a duty to Trump. They know him too well.

But it is those who have avoided duty that have mattered most. The Republicans in Congress are Trump’s underwriters, the co-signatories of the Trump presidency.

They are bystanders underscoring the maxim:

'The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.' 

They have failed in their duty.

The last word should be left to Lincoln. In a speech to the Wisconsin State Agricultural Society in 1859, he recounted the story of the Eastern monarch who charged his wise men with inventing a sentence true for all times.

That sentence was:

“And this too shall pass away.”

And so it shall.

Dr Kim Sawyer is a senior fellow in the School of Historical and Philosophical Studies at the University of Melbourne.

Dr Kim Sawyer is a senior fellow in the School of Historical and Philosophical Studies at the University of Melbourne.

Support independent journalism Subscribe to IA.

Recent articles by Kim Sawyer
Universities Accord fails to restore integrity to higher education

A report outlining recommendations for the future of tertiary education has missed ...  
Banks doing little to protect scam victims

As online scams continue to rob Australians of money, banks are doing little to ...  
Whistleblowers crucial in exposing truth in Roberts-Smith trial

Whistleblowers understand networks. Whistleblowers are scapegoated by them. When ...  
Join the conversation
comments powered by Disqus

Support Fearless Journalism

If you got something from this article, please consider making a one-off donation to support fearless journalism.

Single Donation


Support IAIndependent Australia

Subscribe to IA and investigate Australia today.

Close Subscribe Donate