Trevor Poulton responds to defamation by Scott Morrison

By | | comments |

Lawyer and Labor Party member Trevor Poulton was the victim of defamatory comments made by the Prime Minister, accusing him of anti-Semitism after writing a brief on the dual citizenship of Josh Frydenberg. IA was given a copy of a letter written by Trevor to Scott Morrison as a response to the remarks.

22 July 2019

Dear Prime Minister Morrison,


I refer to your defamatory comments made to the media on 17 July 2019 in response to my ‘Legal Opinion — Frydenberg Case’ dated 11 July 2019, which was addressed to you as Prime Minister and Leader of Liberal Party of Australia.

The legal opinion was emailed to you on the 11th, as well as to various members of the Federal Parliament and to sections of the media. On 15 July 2019, Hugh Riminton, a senior reporter of Ten Eyewitness News, contacted me for an interview to give public exposure to the legal opinion. The interview ran on 16 July 2019.

As a consequence of your comments made about me, I have suffered substantial harm to my character and reputation and to my profession as an Australian Legal Practitioner.

I have practised successfully as a solicitor in various areas of law since 2002. I derive my income from the profession. I have also been a member of the Australian Labor Party for 26 consecutive years and have made a significant contribution to the protection of native forests on public land resulting in the passing of various State legislation and a successful appeal in the Victoria Supreme Court (Court of Appeal) acting on behalf of an environmental activist. I have also been a convenor of an internal ALP campaign to end recreational shooting of native waterbirds, have been elected to various policy committees and am a past President of the ALP Elwood Branch. I am a person of reputable character and have never been threatened with expulsion from the party. I have published a multi-themed literary novel, a collection of poetry and a book on protecting Old-growth forest in Victoria.

A particular community interest for me has been articulating how “political correctness” operates as “political device” in our contemporary democracy to direct and/or oppress constructive discussion and debate. As you would be aware from the legal opinion, I had formed the view that the mishandling of the Frydenberg dual-citizenship case by members of the Federal Parliament exemplified “political correctness” at work. The view was illumined through a historical and legal analysis of the facts surrounding the case.

During the doorstop interview by the media, you were asked a question with reference to Section 44(i) of the Constitution of Australia Act 1900 (Cth) and Joshua Frydenberg MP’s predicament.

Contents of your interview were published by the following media:

The following is extracted from J-Wire’s coverage of the interview:

Josh Frydenber[g] received full support from Prime Minister Scott Morrison was [sic] at a media doorstop: “Is it time to draw a line under Section 44, and amend the constitution to deal with these issues?”


The Prime Minister answered: “I’ll tell you what it’s a time to draw a line on, and it’s anti-Semitism. I mean, the scourge of anti-Semitic graffiti that we’ve seen in Melbourne just this year, it is absolutely sickening and disgraceful. And for a Holocaust denier and an anti-Semite to seek to progress that agenda by pretending to have some sort of constitutional purity on Josh Frydenberg, I’m just going to call it out for what it is. And I think Australians… I think they would share that. Anti-Semitism has no place in this country.


I mean, I saw also what was happening with the graffiti against our colleague Julian Leeser up in Sydney. It’s sickening. And so, we have no truck with these anti-Semitic thoughts or practices or what they’re about. I mean, he shouldn’t be in the Labor Party for a start, how he’s even in there I’ve got no idea because I know that is as abhorrent in their way of thinking as it is to ours. So I’m calling that what it is. Thanks very much.”

Defamatory Imputations

The defamatory imputations, which are all false, were:

  • that Trevor Poulton is an anti-Semite;
  • that Trevor Poulton is a holocaust denier;
  • that Trevor Poulton had an anti-Semitic motive for publishing the ‘Legal Opinion – Frydenberg Case’;
  • that Trevor Poulton seeks to progress the scourge of anti-Semitic graffiti in Melbourne;
  • that Trevor Poulton has anti-Semitic thoughts and practices anti-Semitism;
  • that Trevor Poulton is not fit to be an Australian Legal Practitioner;
  • that Trevor Poulton is not fit to be a member of the Australian Labor Party; and
  • that Trevor Poulton has published comments that are “abhorrent”.

Further, it was implied that:

The defamatory and false comments made by you were totally unjustified and are disgusting.

I hereby request that you immediately cease and desist from making false and defamatory statements against me.

I further request that you immediately withdraw the defamatory and false comments through the publication of a Prime Ministerial Press Release with a copy to be emailed to me.

I note that Parliament resumes in both Houses on 22 July 2019. Whilst you may have Parliamentary privilege in the House of Representatives, being an immunity from the ordinary law, please be advised that any further defamatory statements regarding my character will aggravate the defamation and therefore I respectfully request that you do not defame me in the House during any sitting.

I look forward to your response.


Trevor Poulton

Due to the fact that I will be issuing proceedings for defamation (in an orderly fashion) in the Federal Court of Australia, it is not appropriate for me to make any comments other that what has already been stated in my letter to Prime Mininster Scott Morrison.

Trevor Poulton is a lawyer, author of books The Holocaust Denier and Brick Through The Window (Poems from the 1990s), champion for environmental causes and has been a member of the Labor Party for 26 years.

Support independent journalism Subscribe to IA.

Recent articles by Trevor Poulton
University of Sydney takes down 2019 report on antisemitism

On 31 July 2019, a resident of Kooyong electorate, Michael Staindl, filed a Peti ...  
The Frydenberg case and the stateless refugee claim

Trevor Poulton discusses the matter of an erroneous "stateless passport" clai ...  
Frydenberg's Hungarian citizenship not yet ruled out

The Australian has ineptly asserted that a Hungarian ministerial letter verifies ...  
Join the conversation
comments powered by Disqus

Support IAIndependent Australia

Subscribe to IA and investigate Australia today.

Close Subscribe Donate