Strong Choices: Massive Lies

By | | comments |

Investigative journalist, Steve Bishop, forensically examines the Queensland Government's Strong Choices advertising campaign and declares Premier Newman's $80 billion 'black hole' claim a con.

THE STRONG CHOICES advertising campaign has lied to Queenslanders about the amount of money the Queensland Budget has to pay in interest each year.

The 2013/14 Queensland Budget stated categorically that:

'The General Government sector has a total debt servicing cost estimated at $2.163 billion in 2013/14.'

It’s since decreased to $2.14 billion.

Yet the Newman Government has spent $6 million of the public’s money on trying to fool Queenslanders into helping compile a “People’s Budget” which has to deal with an annual $4 billion debt repayment problem.

Amazingly, the State Government is expecting to earn more in interest in its 'General Government' sector this financial year at $2.412 billion than it’s paying in interest.

It’s the same sort of deceit Prime Minister Abbott and Treasurer Hockey used in creating a false crisis for the federal budget — and we know now from figures withheld from the budget how they’ve used their lies to justify taxing those who can least afford it.

It seems logical to expect the same sort of harsh measures from Premier Newman and State Treasurer Tim Nicholls in the June 3 State Budget following their massive lies.

In order to beef up support for the Liberal National Government’s scheme to flog up to $30 billion of the public’s assets Premier Newman has conned Queenslanders that the Budget has got to fix an $80 billion black hole.

But according to the Government’s own documents, the Budget will only have to deal with General Government borrowings (which) are expected to be $47.372 billion by 2014-15 and increase only slightly in 2015-16 and 2016-17.

(Gross borrowings were only $37.9 billion at June 30 2013. The last Budget Papers noted that the Newman Government’s

'... capital purchases of $7.1 billion in 2013/14 will be funded entirely by borrowings'.)

$47.372 billion. Not $80 billion.

Mr Newman and Mr Nicholls have nearly doubled the figure for the debt which has to be dealt with by the Budget.

Fact: for his Budget Queensland Treasurer Nicholls will NOT be faced with cutting funding for hospital, school or roads because he has to find $4 billion from the Budget in interest payments as suggested in the Strong Choices propaganda.

Interest repayments to be accounted for in this year’s Budget? Maybe $2.4 billion. And maybe $2.5 billion by 2017/17. Not $4 billion.

The bigger the lie, the more it will be believed.

And, let’s face it, this is a whopper!

The Strong Choices propaganda says:

 “Independent economic experts believe Queensland must reduce debt by $25-30 billions …”

In fact, the only source I could find for insisting on this gigantic sell-off was the Newman-appointed Commission of Audit headed by Liberal Party member and former Coalition Government Treasurer, Peter Costello.

So where does this figure of $80 million come from?

The Strong Choices propaganda boasts that all the figures it uses

 “are real, and drawn from Queensland’s actual finances”

But I could find nothing in the Strong Choices documentation to support the $80 billion debt figure.

There were reams of explanations about reducing costs and selling assets but there was not one sentence about the actual debt to be dealt with by the Budget.

It’s like a surgeon asking you how much of a leg you want amputated without explaining what the problem is — and when a second opinion says there’s no need for an amputation at all.

The con trick played by the Newman Government is to add the borrowings of

'entities such as those that operate in the energy, transport and water industries'

which are expected to have gross borrowings of $31.3 billion by June 30 this year, according to the Mid-Year Review.

And the Government’s own Budget Papers explain that these

 'entities utilise debt financing as a source of funds for capital investment and to maintain an optimum capital structure'

and the entities

'are required to take a prudent and sound approach to the management of debt…'

In other words, it makes sense for these government businesses (most of which are corporations operating under the regulations of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission) to borrow money and use debt as a sensible economic option.

Moreover, these Government-owned corporations have to convince ratings agencies that their debt truly is self-sustaining.

Strong Choices could have used many figures in its propositions, including those for net debt. The last Budget Papers say:

 'Net debt for the general government sector in 2012/13 is forecast to be $3.555 billion, $1.565 billion less than forecast in the 2012/13 Budget. Net debt will increase to $10.821 billion [since revised to $9.2 billion] in 2013/14 as a result of increased borrowings in that year…'

The Newman Government was elected in 2012.

Yes, Queensland does have a comparatively large debt and it has led to our credit rating being downgraded from AAA to AA. The previous government’s Budget Papers projected dealing with this debt without selling any more assets.

And independent economic expert, John Quiggin, believes the situation is manageable without the sale of our assets which this financial year are forecast to contribute $1.7 billion to the State’s coffers in dividends and tax equivalents, after having paid the interest on their debts as part of operations.


That’s right, the types assets the Government wants to sell paid more than two-thirds of the interest bill faced by the Budget last year — and are likely to again this year.

The Mid-Year Review showed income of $44.9 billion and interest payments of $2.1 billion. My schoolboy maths suggests that is an equivalent of less than 5% — which is less than many people are paying for their mortgages.

Strong Choices blurbed that the Government

“is committed to encouraging economic literacy”

and to this end

“citizens must have access to the range of information they need”.

The Government has withheld vital information from the Strong Choices campaign and created an artificial “crisis” just as the Abbott Government did.

Three days after submitting this article to Treasurer Nicholls for a response there was no reply.

Don’t be fooled. There is no crisis.

There is no need to sell assets.

There is no need for harsh measures.

If Premier Newman or Treasurer Nicholls start talking of the need to make Strong Choices to fix an $80 billion black hole in the Budget you’ll know they’re telling Massive Lies.

Features #1
Card image
Support card subtitle

Some quick example text to build on the card title .

link Second link

Monthly Donation


Single Donation


Join Newsletter

Please fill the text in this image in the field below to assist us in eliminating spam

Recent articles by Steve Bishop
News Corp continues to endorse climate change nonsense

An article in The Australian has proven once again how out of touch the Murdoch ...  
Development in protected Moreton Bay wetlands fails to demonstrate 'net benefit'

Final plans to build 3,600 homes on internationally-protected wetlands at ...  
If the Voice Referendum fails, it will be Pyrrhic victory for Dutton

If the polls are correct, Liberal Leader Peter Dutton will achieve a Pyrrhic ...  
Join the conversation
comments powered by Disqus

Support Fearless Journalism

If you got something from this article, please consider making a one-off donation to support fearless journalism.

Single Donation


Support IAIndependent Australia

Subscribe to IA and investigate Australia today.

Close Subscribe Donate