Protesters denounce U.S. strike on Syria

By | | comments |
Anti war protesters in New York (screen shot via ruptly.tv)

Protests denounce Syria strikes as U.S. threatens "to do more" and Australia plays follow the leader. Common Dreams' Andrea Germanos reports.

PROTESTS took place in cities across the United States and beyond on Friday to denounce President Donald Trump's missile strikes on Syria.

The strikes on a Syrian air base – launched without congressional approval or UN authorisation – were said to be in retaliation for Tuesday's chemical weapons attack against Syrian civilians, though there has not yet been an independent investigation showing that the chemical attack was, as the U.S. claims, ordered by President Bashar al-Assad.

While the direct military attack against the Syrian Government elicited fawning praise from media and lawmakers on both sides of the aisle, peace groups and humanitarian voices have condemned them — and many hit the streets to say that "bombs are not the answer" to the country's ongoing conflict.

In Philadelphia, dozens of protesters marched against the strikes, with some carrying signs reading 'U.S. Out of the Middle East'.

In New York City's Union Square, a protester, Martin Jennings, said to NBC New York:

"It's only going to escalate the violence. I'm really concerned about the future of the Syrian people."

In Chicago, protester Vicki Cervantes stated to CBS, "The tragedy of the children is heart-rending," possibly referring to the children killed in the chemical attack or those killed in ongoing coalition strikes.

"But I think the response of escalation – of more bombing, of more war – only means more dead children."

In Detroit, Joe Mchahwar, son of a Syrian native, helped organise a protest and told MLive.com:

"Even if international law is broken in a place, we're not some vigilante, rogue power that should just be allowed to go attack anyone that they deem has broken the law."

Across the Atlantic, the British Stop the War Coalition held what it called an "emergency protest" Friday evening at Downing Street, saying the missiles launched by Trump: 

... will only increase the level of killing in Syria and inflame the terrible war that has already caused untold misery for the people of the country.

This is the worst possible way to respond to the indefensible attack at Khan Sheikhun. As well as deepening the tragedy of the Syrian people, this utterly irresponsible act threatens to widen the war and lead the West into military confrontation with Russia. 

Earlier on Friday, during a UN Security Council meeting – in which the Bolivian ambassador to the United Nations offered a vital history lesson – U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Nikki Haley, who "seemed to be channeling George W Bush even more than her actual boss"according to one observer, described the strikes as "a very measured step".

She said:

"We are prepared to do more. But we hope that will not be necessary. It is time for all civilised nations to stop the horrors that are taking place in Syria and demand a political solution."

Threatening to rise tensions with Russia, she said:

"Every time Assad has crossed the line of human decency, Russia has stood beside him ... Assad did this because he thought he could get away with it. He thought he could get away with it because he knew Russia had his back."

The Associated Press writes that at the meeting,

'Russia's deputy ambassador, Vladimir Safronkov, strongly criticised what he called the U.S. "flagrant violation of international law and an act of aggression" whose "consequences for regional and international security could be extremely serious."'

The New York Times adds:

'President Vladimir V. Putin's office called the Tomahawk cruise missile strike on Syria a violation of international law and a "significant blow" to the Russian-American relationship, while Prime Minister Dmitri A. Medvedev said it had "completely ruined" it.'

U.S. Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin said later Friday that the U.S. was preparing more sanctions aimed at Syria.

But what Trump must do, according to Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and a handful of other lawmakers, is

" ... come to Congress to authorise any further use of force against the Assad regime."


Given the two weeks of recess members of Congress are about have, Win Without War is circulating a petition that states:

Only Congress can authorise the type of military force the President just unleashed on Syria. Instead of heading out of town for two weeks of vacation, we call on you to immediately return to Washington to debate and vote on Trump's military escalation in Syria.

President Donald Trump said that the attack was prompted by concern for the lives of Syrian civilians, but his administration has shown callous disregard for Syrians attempting to flee for their lives," noted Margaret Huang, executive director of Amnesty International USA. "He must immediately revoke the Muslim travel ban and end restrictions on refugees from Syria, fleeing the horrors at home.

This story was originally published on Common Dreams and has been republished under a Creative Commons licence.

Monthly Donation


Single Donation


Support independent journalism. Subscribe to IA for just $5.

Recent articles by Common Dreams
Three years after January 6, Trump remains grave threat to democracy

In a recent speech to mark the third anniversary of the Capitol attack, President ...  
Chaos erupts after far-Right attack on Brazilian Congress

Far-Right supporters of ousted Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro have failed to ...  
Elon Musk accused of hypocrisy by kicking critical journalists off Twitter

Musk suspending journalists' accounts is petty and vindictive and absolutely ...  
Join the conversation
comments powered by Disqus

Support Fearless Journalism

If you got something from this article, please consider making a one-off donation to support fearless journalism.

Single Donation


Support IAIndependent Australia

Subscribe to IA and investigate Australia today.

Close Subscribe Donate