Politics Opinion

Peter Dutton's hypocrisy reaches new low

By | | comments |
Peter Dutton's comments demonstrate hypocrisy given the Government's lack of support for women and human rights (Screenshot via YouTube)

Given the Government’s treatment of women and refugees, Peter Dutton’s comments in the Sydney Morning Herald are pure hypocrisy, writes Hayden O'Connor.

* CONTENT WARNING: This article discusses rape

ON 10 JANUARY, Minister for Defence and Leader of the House Peter Dutton told the Sydney Morning Herald and The Age that he found it quite remarkable that sports stars and celebrities weren’t using their status to criticise China’s human rights abuses and their treatment of women.

If Peter Dutton wasn’t a minister in a government that has kept refugees in detention for nine years and if his workplace of Parliament House didn’t have one-third of its employees having experienced sexual harassment, then his criticism of sports stars and celebrities wouldn’t be so difficult to stomach.

But as a man who described Brittany Higgins’ rape claim as he said, she said, Peter Dutton is nothing but an opportunistic hypocrite.

In the exclusive piece (which deliberately fails to mention this government’s despicable treatment of women), Dutton was quoted telling the Sydney Morning Herald and The Age the following:

“I don’t understand how, in the year 2021, in the #MeToo age, we can have an international female tennis star who claims to have been raped and sexually assaulted and she’s now effectively under house arrest and has had her social media account wiped, and somehow that’s behaviour that we should tolerate.”

When examining the treatment of women in Australia last year, one might struggle to understand how, in the year 2021, in the #MeToo age, we can have a woman claiming to have been raped in Parliament House and the Government’s response was to background against her partner and inform March4Justice protestors that they were lucky not to be met with bullets.

One might also struggle to understand how the rape allegation against retiring MP Christian Porter didn’t result in a parliamentary inquiry. Why didn’t Dutton speak up on these occasions?

Dutton is, of course, correct that China’s reaction to Peng Shuai’s allegations should not be tolerated, but that’s not the point. When you’re in a position of power and you can do something to help women, but you refuse to act and speak up like Dutton and his government have done, you then have no right to criticise others.

This government has refused to implement all recommendations of the Kate JenkinsRespect@Work report and two of this government’s MPs have made a habit of suing women who criticise them. Dutton didn’t speak up then either, although perhaps he was occupied with his own legal action.

In regards to human rights, Peter Dutton has accused the Biloela family of using every trick in the book to avoid deportation and he also claimed that showing compassion to the Bioela family would send a bad message to people smugglers.

Dutton also stated in the Sydney Morning Herald article:

“We wouldn’t tolerate, and nor would we ever want to tolerate, the suggestion that if somebody had been raped, that it wasn’t going to be addressed.”

Yet here we are just a day before a full year since Brittany Higgins’ claim that she was raped in Parliament House and we are yet to see Phil Gaetjens' report into whom in Prime Minister Scott Morrison’s office knew about the incident and when. Gaetjens’ investigation was suspended a second time in late August last year.

So, it would appear that Peter Dutton does indeed tolerate a rape claim not being addressed. Or perhaps he just thinks his “he said, she said” remark addressed the matter appropriately. Perhaps he believes that’s all a rape claim requires. This would not be surprising considering that he accused rape victims detained on Nauru of trying it on so they could enter Australia for an abortion.

Peter Dutton has no right and no authority to criticise others for failing to act and speak up on the treatment of women or human rights issues, given his own track record and the track record of the Government that he is part of — even when that criticism (of China) is evidently warranted.

If we are seeing a new and improved Peter Dutton, then surely he will start speaking up and speaking against his own government very soon. Until then, I’m going to assume that his comments regarding China are nothing more than opportunistic political tactics designed to make China the new enemy so this government can beat the drums of war as we head towards an election in May.

So, Peter Dutton, will you speak up?

If you would like to speak to someone about sexual violence, please call the 1800 Respect hotline on 1800 737 732 or chat online

Hayden O’Connor is an I.T. professional from Tasmania who currently lives in Melbourne. You can follow Hayden on Twitter @HaydenJOConnor.

Related Articles

Support independent journalism Subscribe to IA.

 
Recent articles by Hayden O'Connor
Poll reveals support for climate action but no consensus on 2030 targets

Last week, the Australian Conservation Foundation released the results of their ...  
Mainstream media targets Independent candidate spending

Recent articles focusing on the social media spending of Independent candidates are ...  
Groth pre-selection shows Vic Liberals have learnt nothing

Sam Groth has been selected as the Liberal Party candidate for Nepean, but his ...  
Join the conversation
comments powered by Disqus

Support IAIndependent Australia

Subscribe to IA and investigate Australia today.

Close Subscribe Donate