(Image by @kieragorden)

Tragically for Australia, the conduct of the blundering new government and its boorish leader is being observed by other nations — and reported.

(This is third part of Alan Austin’s report, prompted by Prime Minister Tony Abbott’s recent travels. Read part one here and part two here.)

PART 3: THE ABBOTT EMBARRASSMENT

Two themes dominate recent overseas media reports on the Abbott Government. Dismay at the ineptitude of international diplomacy. And bewilderment at an austerity budget imposed on the best-performed economy in the world.

Reflecting on Abbott’s recent visit to Canada Christopher Hume at the Toronto Star skewered both Canada’s and Australia’s leaders in a piece on Monday headed ‘Stephen Harper and Tony Abbott deserve each other’:

'What a pair they made, Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott and Canada’s own Stephen Harper — Gollum and Mr Potato Head — publicly thanking each other for their honesty in Ottawa last week. Unlike most world leaders — if that’s the right term — these two want to be frank; they will do nothing to stop global warming, they proudly declared, if it might hurt the economy.'

Hume’s analysis elaborated on 'their obvious shortcomings' and noted that Abbott

'... outside Australia will always be the man who was sliced and diced into little pieces in the famous ‘misogyny speech’ by his predecessor Julia Gillard delivered in 2012. After being reamed out so definitively, it’s a wonder he can still show his face in public.'

But after Canada, Abbott did, indeed, show his face in the United States.

What he was told in private by various high-ranking officials remains confidential.

However, influential congressman Henry Waxman blasted Abbott publicly, telling him that repealing the carbon pricing scheme was a "mistake":

'Australia will go from being one of the great leaders in the world in tackling this problem, to one of the great laggers ...'

Two national leaders aghast at Abbott’s and Harper’s obstruction of efforts to contain climate-related catastrophe are the presidents of Kiribati and the Marshall Islands.

An article in Terra Argentina reported the alarm of the Pacific islands’ leaders:

'For his part, the President of the Marshall Islands, Christopher Loeak, said: ‘I'm very concerned that the prime minister [Abbott] is setting the wrong tone in what needs to be a very determined effort to tackle climate change’.'

In a major departure from protocol, The China Daily openly criticised Abbott’s tardiness in finalising the free trade agreement.

It noted Abbott’s

'... economically historic tour around the Asian neighborhood, deftly securing trade pacts with South Korea and Japan.'

Then continued:

'Yet a free trade agreement with China, representing an opportunity several orders of magnitude greater than both deals combined, remains – after nine fruitless years – unfulfilled.'

For other observers abroad, domestic events deserved attention — and, mostly, condemnation.

In France, Sud Ouest reported mirthfully on Abbott’s reintroduction of knighthoods. It noted that Queen Elizabeth II was advised of the move, but not Abbott’s ministers.The article suggested this was un bond dans le passé (a leap into the past).

The French Courrier International agreed, asking of Abbott, 'vit-il dans le passé?' (does he live in the past?)

The Times of India reported protests over Tasmania’s endangered forests.

It noted the vast scale of Australia's timber industry with more than 66,000 workers and annual turnover of A$22 billion. Then claimed Abbott was 'wanting more forest available'.

'The opposition Greens Party has labelled Abbott the "dig it up, cut it down prime minister" with the government's environmental credentials under close scrutiny since coming to office last September.' 

'They have no shame!' declared French journal L’Humanité in its report on Australia’s May budget.

'The conservative government intends to push the legal age of retirement to 70 years by 2035. They are blaming it on the ‘fiscal crisis’, according to Canberra.'

London-based The Economist ran a similar budget critique:

'A mining boom, driven by trade with China, has helped Australia to weather the global downturn without suffering from a recession; the country has enjoyed 22 years of uninterrupted growth ... Mr Abbott complains that his government inherited a ‘debt and deficit disaster’ from its predecessor. Yet Australia’s net debt ... is quite modest compared with most other rich countries.'

An extended New York Times report analysed proposed changes to university fees. Headed ‘An uproar in Australia over proposal to deregulate tuition’ the analysis quoted all sides of the debate.

Last word was given to chair of Universities Australia Professor Sandra Harding:

"A reasoned and sensible approach to a developing marketplace just cannot be achieved immediately ... As events in the recent past have shown, undue haste and poor execution pose grave risks to even the soundest policy intent.”

The German language Tages Anzeiger headed its budget report with ‘Sex hotline worker brings Premier embarrassment’:

'Tony Abbott is accustomed political headwinds. But the Australian prime minister did not expect an attack by a 67-year-old telephone sex worker.'

The thrust of the article was dismay at the decision to cut welfare as the first move. It reported storms of indignation – 'landesweiten Entrüstungssturm' – across Australia.

France’s Le Figaro claimed Abbott was struggling to justify patient payments for doctors’ visits, cutbacks to health and education and raising the retirement age.

This piece also observed the embarrassment of the clumsy wink – clin d'oeil maladroit – and noted that Abbott is réputé pour ses gaffes – famous for his blunders.

Even Rupert Murdoch’s The Times in London reported

‘Tony Abbott labelled “creep” after winking during call with sex-line pensioner'.

The one positive story about the Hockey Budget was in Murdoch’s New York Post, which noted approvingly the government’s

'... layoffs for 16,500 government workers ... cuts in entitlements, cuts in welfare, new fees on visits to the doctor’s office, slashed subsidies to businesses ...'

True to form, the journal just made up that last item.

The next wave of negative stories looks like being on Australia’s bizarre decision to change its terminology for East Jerusalem from 'occupied' to 'disputed'.

The International Herald Tribune ran a piece pondering why Australia was 'seemingly going out on a limb' at this time.

Originally from The BBC, the article quoted Independent Senator Nick Xenophon claiming it was

'... an extraordinary and reckless departure from the bipartisan approach of the last 47 years.'

Finally, that hilarious video by John Oliver gets wider and wider coverage:

From India:

‘Tony Abbott, President of the USA of Australia’.

The USA:

 ‘John Oliver neatly sums up just how appalling Tony Abbott is’.

New Zealand:

‘Tony Abbott roasted by comedian’.

Ireland:

‘John Oliver rips Aussie PM a new one after he offends women, gay people and the Irish’.

Richard Dawkins:

‘... besieged with religious bigots in positions of power’.

The UK:

‘The laughing stock of the world’.

Unfortunately they are laughing at Australia, not with us.

Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Australia License

Monthly Donation

$

Single Donation

$

Join Newsletter


First
Last
*
*
Please fill the text in this image in the field below to assist us in eliminating spam
 

A selection of John Graham originals, including the above may be purchased from IA's online store. (See more of John's political art on his Cartoons and Caricatures Facebook page.)

 

Share this article:   

Note: 12 Nov 14 | Social counts have been reset as IA moves to a full SSL platform.

Join the conversation Comments Policy

comments powered by Disqus