Abbott’s problems are all Rudd’s and Gillard’s fault

By | | comments |

Alan Austin investigates why Abbott's humiliation is such a huge story with the international media.

WHY IS the leader of a relatively small country deciding in good faith to honour a long-serving elderly official such a monumental story around the globe? 

Make no mistake, this is huge. Australia’s Tony Abbott knighting Prince Philip was reported extensively in Commonwealth countries keen on any scandal involving royalty – Canada, Britain, New Zealand, South Africa, Malaysia and elsewhere. Just The Star in Malaysia carried five separate articles

It was news in France, Spain, Russia, Denmark, Switzerland, Lithuania, Pakistan, the U.S.A., Germany, Ireland, Holland, Japan, Indonesia, Singapore, Thailand and Tahiti. In China, several hundred outlets across the nation covered it on television and in print.

Journals include top mastheads. In France, it was reported by Paris Match, Le Nouvel Observateur, L’Express, Free, Le Point, Le Petit Journal and Pure People.

Many played the story straight. Some were even sympathetic to the unappreciated Aussie battler PM. But most seemed to relish his verlegenheit, or смущение, or malu, or 困窘, or kejengahan, or varžymasis, or embarrassment.

Greece was delighted, of course. Neos Kosmos led with

“Έλληνας» ο νέος Ιππότης της Αυστραλίας”

“Greek” the new Knight of Australia

Making sense of this global fascination with an incident, which only impacts one person negatively – Abbott himself – may be helped by a retrospective of big international stories from Australia.

After a sleepy period through the 1950s and 60s, the Whitlam years provided significant world news. Stories included the first visit by a Western leader to China and major shifts in relations with both Britain and the U.S.A. Gone were imperial honours, ‘God Save the Queen’ and automatic engagement in U.S. invasions.

The Fraser years provided fewer fireworks – after, that is, the drama of the Coalition “coup” subsided.

Coverage through the Hawke and Keating years included economic initiatives such as floating the dollar, cutting tariffs and the wages accord. Plus the personalities of the two men themselves.

John Howard’s bold gun buy-back scheme then strongly impressed. It was a big positive story in 1996 and still turns up often. Le Figaro, Le Point, The New York Times, The Washington Post, Time Magazine and The Daily Show with Jon Stewart have all run John Howard gun control stories in recent years.

After that, however, it was all downhill. Journalists abroad were appalled as John Howard slashed overseas aid, became George W. Bush’s deputy sheriff in the Pacific, refused to sign Kyoto, declined to apologise to the stolen generations, paid bribes to Saddam Hussein in the Iraq oil for wheat scandal, backed the illegal U.S. invasion of Iraq and upset relations with neighbours the Solomon Islands, Indonesia, Malaysia, Fiji and P.N.G.

The world was amazed at the next Government: that new leader Kevin Rudd was a Canberra outsider, that the Kyoto accord was signed immediately, the formal apology delivered on the second day of the new Parliament, and so on.

An early report in Zeit in Germany was headlined ‘Vorbild Down Under’ – Model Down Under. It noted Rudd’s two first official acts: signing the Kyoto Protocol and the formal apology. It observed that the latter was ‘beispielhafte politik der versöhnung’ – an exemplary policy of reconciliation.

The article suggested that:

‘even the German Social Democrats could look closely at the history and success of this Rudd model’.

'Model Down Under', Zeit On Line, October 2008.

Other journals to cover the Rudd ascension with approval – just in Germany – included Süddeutsche, Deutsche Welle, Der Spiegel, Stern and Die Welt. Similar stories appeared elsewhere.

Then Rudd telling China to fix their human rights – in language they understood – was reported globally, including across China. The headline of this piece translates as ‘Rudd urges the Communist Party of China to revisit human rights during the Olympic Games’.

Another headline translates:

‘Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd delivers frank talk about human rights in Tibet and wins respect in Peking University speech’.

The Rudd and Gillard period saw repairs to all relations with the region shattered during the Howard years. Australia was given a seat on the United Nations Security Council, asked to chair the Pacific Island Forum and voted to chair the G20 group of the world’s 20 major economies.

Gillard addressed the joint meeting of the U.S. Congress in 2011 and received a record six standing ovations and ten seated rounds of applause. All widely covered.

And just in case all that wasn't enough, they generated the best economy the world has seen — during the worst global downturn since the 1930s. Treasurer Wayne Swan getting the best treasurer award was noted.

Wayne Swan wins 'Finance Minister of the Year Award' for the best-performing economy.

Then came a searing moment which made not only Julia Gillard the darling of the world’s media, but inaugurated the international reputation of Tony Abbott. That was the famous misogyny speech, covered prominently in almost every major newspaper, from the U.S.A., the U.K. and Finland to Slovenia, Portugal and Japan.

It was not good coverage for Abbott. Christopher Hume of the Canada’s Toronto Star recently described Abbott as the leader who:

'... outside Australia will always be the man who was sliced and diced into little pieces in the famous ‘misogyny speech’ by his predecessor Julia Gillard delivered in 2012. After being reamed out so definitively, it’s a wonder he can still show his face in public.'

Gillard's 'misogny speech' went viral globally prompting a new definition in the Macquarie Dictionary

The theme running through this short potted history appears to be this: that the world’s media will applaud Australian moves towards being a good global citizen, having an independent voice, ending imperialism – ancient or modern – supporting global initiatives to advance women, protect the planet, end racism and defend the disadvantaged.

Retroactive decisions will be noted with disappointment, sometimes dismay and, where necessary, ridicule.

Hence the highly negative media coverage of much of Abbott’s brief prime ministership so far. His election win was greeted with incredulity by many publications.  Rue 89 in France headed its piece:

‘Sexiste et beauf : voici Tony Abbott, nouveau premier ministre australien’

'Sexist and redneck: here is Australia’s new prime minister Tony Abbott'

'Sexist and redneck: here is Tony Abbott, Australia's new PM', Headline in Rue 89, 8 September 2013

It has gotten worse since then. Abbott’s destruction of relations with Indonesia, his activism against action on climate change, cutting foreign aid to the region, his embarrassing trip to Davos in January last year, his ineptitude in France on D-Day last June, his continual sexism offences and his failure to pass the budget have all been reported globally with dismay.

And now his obeisance to the oldest of the old guard of the British royals.

Perhaps Abbott’s humiliation in the world’s media might not have been so mortifying had his two predecessors been somewhat less impressive in their eyes.

But to look on the bright side, perhaps he will not be in the spotlight for much longer.

(image courtesy John Graham)

You can follow Alan Austin on Twitter @AlanTheAmazing.

Buy John Graham originals from IA's online store.

Features #1
Card image
Support card subtitle

Some quick example text to build on the card title .

link Second link

Monthly Donation


Single Donation


Join Newsletter

Please fill the text in this image in the field below to assist us in eliminating spam

Recent articles by Alan Austin
ABC's 'Nemesis' series whitewashes the Coalition's failures

The ABC's recent mini-series 'Nemesis' has failed to depict accurately the damage ...  
No end in sight to ever-rising Indigenous incarceration numbers

With numbers of Indigenous Australians in prisons reaching an all-time high and ...  
2024: A year when Trump (and others) will test the resilience of global democracy

With more people heading to the polls in 2024 than any year before, elections in ...  
Join the conversation
comments powered by Disqus

Support Fearless Journalism

If you got something from this article, please consider making a one-off donation to support fearless journalism.

Single Donation


Support IAIndependent Australia

Subscribe to IA and investigate Australia today.

Close Subscribe Donate