Six independent news sources that sold out to the highest bidder

By | | comments |
(Image via

Anti-Media's Jake Anderson discusses six examples of recent corporate acquisitions of digital platforms and the implications for independent news and journalistic integrity.

ONE OF THE MOST powerful propaganda tools is still print journalism.

Though most sources have migrated to digital platforms and now integrate video and social media avenues in order to stay relevant, acquisitions of news publications remain an insidious way to control mainstream narratives.

The following six examples mark the most egregious recent sell-outs in online journalism:

The Huffington Post

Arianna Huffington’s namesake media empire, The Huffington Post, originated in 2005 as a liberal news aggregating alternative to the Drudge Report. It even won a Pulitzer Prize in 2012. However, the writing was already on the wall, as one year earlier, Huffington sold HuffPo to AOL for $315 million.

The acquisition caused many to question whether major corporate influence would dramatically affect the publication. Unsurprisingly, the answer was “yes”, as within a few short years the website became a pro-corporate mainstream media vessel watered down with anaemic liberal platitudes. These days, HuffPo is little more than clickbait with pulse — a partisan aggregator of trending stories that rarely, if ever, questions the symbiotic nature of state and corporate messaging.

Take these hard-hitting headlines as anecdotal evidence:

10 Things to do with Mac ‘n’ Cheese Before you Die

Japan earthquake and god’s will

Could nuclear war reverse global warming?

PHOTOS: 9 Politicians Eating Pizza

Last year, Verizon acquired AOL, making it the de facto owner of HuffPo, further consolidating control of the publication into the hands of heavily compromised corporate interests.

Vice Media

Long time countercultural icon Vice shocked more than a few people when it sold five per cent of its stock to stalwart conservative ideologue and media tycoon, Rupert Murdoch and his 21st Century Fox. Many immediately saw the $70 million stake as a social engineering chess move by the mogul.

Last year, Disney injected Vice with an additional $200 million, to which A&E added $250 million for a 10 per cent share.

Now worth $2.5 billion, the former Montreal-based punk magazine masquerades as an indie renegade news brand that reports from the most extreme geopolitical nooks and crannies on the globe. In actuality, Vice functions as a kind of Trojan horse for nationalist propaganda while also providing advertisers with an invaluable data-mining tool. Between social media and entities like Vice, the establishment has unfettered access to the hearts and minds of ostensibly anti-establishment millennials.

Reddit thread documents how Vice was a propaganda machine from the get-go. Check out this interview with co-founder Shane Smith about sponsorship deals.

Further evidencing Vice’s newfound biases, the Washington Posrecently reported:

on at least two occasions, it wove documentary footage into promotions for advertisers. In another instance, a months-long investigative project was killed, apparently out of concern about its effect on a major sponsor.’

National Geographic

It turned out Rupert Murdoch had another trick up his sleeve last year, when 21st Century Fox announced the stunning 73 per cent acquisition of National Geographic. Suddenly, the respected yellow bound nature magazine – which for 127 years had been a non-profit – was taken over by the same climate change denier who presides over Fox News.

While it remains to be seen how big of an impact the new ownership will have over Nat Geo’s journalistic integrity, it’s hard to imagine it won’t have a deleterious effect. Already, Murdoch has fired most of the long-time, celebrated staff of the magazine – 180 staffers, including photographers and designers – and critics have noted Murdoch’s penchant for changing the editorial direction of recently-acquired publications. Whether this will mean blatant revisionism with regard to climate change remains to be seen.

The Onion

The Onion is one of the most beloved publications on the Internet. For years, their hilariously gut-wrenching satirical headlines have perfectly encapsulated America’s hypocrisies with unflinching, often brutal honesty. Earlier this year, Univision bought a 40 per cent controlling interest in the company, which includes the right to buy the site, as well as ownership over the sister satire site, Clickhole.

The Intercept points out an interesting fact: one of Hillary Clinton’s biggest supporters and financial backers is Univision co-owner and chairman Haim Saban. Conflict of interest? Let’s do a bit of comparison.

Consider this pre-acquisition headline: ‘Hillary Clinton to nation: “Do not f**k this up for me.”’

And now, this post-acquisition headline: ‘Female presidential candidate who was United States Senator, Secretary Of State told to be more inspiring.’

And incidentally, Saban has been brazen about his political meddling in the Democratic Party. According to The Intercept, he has openly stated the three ways to manipulate American politics are political donations, think tanks and controlling media outlets. Check, check, and check.


Reddit is a social bookmarking nd news aggregarion site that has somewhat of a cult following.

After outpacing competitors Digg and StumbleUponReddit is now visited by 6 per cent of all adults who use the Internet, garnering three billion page views a month. A huge part of this meteoric rise was its 2006 acquisition by Conde Naste. Since then, its valuation has soared from $20 million to an estimated $240 million.

The real price, however, may have been the site’s integrity. After its acquisition and the departure of founder Steve Huffman, Reddit has been riddled with accusations of censorship and “manufactured consensus”.  Anti-Media documented these charges last year, detailing blatant cases of administrative censorship, rampant trolling by shills, guerilla propaganda wars, branded and celebrity-sponsored AMA’s and more.

Blue Nation Review

Last year, Hillary Clinton ally David Brock acquired Blue Nation Review, a long-time staple of independent liberal journalism. If you thought the Onion purchase was bad, this one is outright awful. The Hillary Clinton camp now essentially controls its very own media outlet. Recent headlines include ‘Hated By Insiders, Loved by the People – Hillary Clinton Is the Great American Populist.’

Since Brock’s 80 per cent acquisition, the entire BNR staff has been replaced.

What to read instead

We’re not necessarily saying you have to completely disavow these sources because of their new corporate overlords but it is good to stay grounded with independent news. This article lists six non-corporate news outlets to follow. While you’re at it, you may as well add yours truly, Anti-Media. Corporate influence will never compromise our journalistic integrity.

This story was originally published by and has been republished under a Creative Commons licence.

Monthly Donation


Single Donation


Support independent journalism. Subscribe to IA for just $5.

Recent articles by Anti Media
WhatsApp isn’t only giving your data to Facebook — and no, you can't opt out

Anti-Media's Josie Wales discusses the privacy implications of the WhatsApp/Fa ...  
Six independent news sources that sold out to the highest bidder

Anti-Media's Jake Anderson discusses six examples of recent corporate acquisi ...  
Join the conversation
comments powered by Disqus

Support IAIndependent Australia

Subscribe to IA and investigate Australia today.

Close Subscribe Donate