LOGIN SHOP
Republic News

Monarchy: a global reality check

By | | comments |

 

 
by Ross Garrad



During the leadup to the 1999 referendum, there was a concerted campaign to discredit the very word “republic” by linking it to some of the nastiest regimes on the face of the earth, such as Iraq, North Korea, and of course several African dictatorships (guaranteed to push a few racist buttons!). We were told, over and over again, that monarchies are inherently better at protecting individual freedoms, though of course the evidence was either totally lacking, or an insult to our intelligence.

King Fahd of Saudi Arabia, ruler of a barbaric medievel dictatorship.


A FEW people brought up counter-examples, such as the barbaric medieval monarchy of Saudi Arabia, and the plutocratic royal family of Brunei, who have looted their country’s oil wealth and ruled by emergency decree since dissolving the elected parliament and suppressing democratic organizations in 1964, with British help.

Now it’s time for a more scientific approach. The US organization Freedom House (www.freedomhouse.org) rates all countries for their level of freedom and every year releases a score. It looks at "civil liberties" and gives a rating on a 7-point scale, with 1 denoting freedom and 7 a repressive police state. Freedom House also publishes "political rights" rankings, denoting how democratic a country is, and these are usually close to the liberties ratings. Let’s go around the world, comparing republics (R) and monarchies (M) that seem to be culturally and economically similar using the 2010 result.

Europe (West): France (R) 1; UK (M) 1.

Europe (North): Finland (R) 1; Sweden (M) 1.

North America: USA (R) 1, Canada (M) 1.

Middle East: Egypt (R) 5; Saudi Arabia (M) 6.

Asia (South-East): Indonesia (R) 3; Malaysia (M) 4.

(Yes, the Indonesian Republic is ahead of monarchist Malaysia! And the Kingdom of Brunei is right down at 5.)

Asia (North): Taiwan (R) 2; Japan (M)  2.

Pacific: Fiji (R) 4, Vanuatu (R) 2, Solomon Islands (M) 3, Tonga (M) 3.

The obvious conclusion? The level of freedom enjoyed by a country’s people has no relationship to whether it is a monarchy or a republic. Other factors are involved, particularly the degree of engagement by the people in the system of government, which is exactly what republicans are trying to encourage in Australia.  
Recent articles by Ross Garrad
AUS1st: (Part 4 & Final) Democratising our Constitution

"The challenge for Australian Republicans" — democratising our Constitution. In ...  
AUS1st (Part 3): A safe, unifying, evolutionary pathway to our fully sovereign future.

"The challenge for Australian republicans”. In the third of his four-part series ...  
AUS1st (Part 2): Explaining the AUS1st plan for a better, stronger Australia

"As simple as possible, but no simpler”. In the second of his three-part series ...  
Join the conversation
comments powered by Disqus

Support IAIndependent Australia

IA is dedicated to providing fearless, independent journalism, free for all, with no barriers. But we need your help. To keep us speaking truth to power, please consider donating to IA today - even a dollar will make a huge difference - or subscribe and receive all the benefits of membership. Keep ‘em honest. Support IA.

Close Subscribe Donate