The dishonest, sexist, smear campaign against Julia Gillard

By | | comments |

Prime Minister Julia Gillard’s speech at a news conference on Thursday, in which she said she had been the subject of a “sexist smear campaign”, has won the support of female former high-profile politicians from across the political spectrum, reports The Hoopla.

Kerry Chikarovski, Natasha Stott Despoja and Cheryl Kernot told The Hoopla that the PM’s speech was “courageous” and it was time that misogynist behaviour in politics was recognised and denounced.

They also said personal attacks against her made it increasingly difficult for those seeking a role in public life.

Ms Gillard called the news conference to answer questions surrounding her role as an industrial lawyer at Slater & Gordon in the early 1990s when acting for an Australian Workers Union branch run by her then partner, the allegedly corrupt Bruce Wilson.

Ms Gillard rejected claims she had acted unethically or illegally:
“In terms of the people who continue to circulate these claims — will the misogynists and the nutjobs on the internet continue to circulate them? Yes they will…. they will continue to pursue these claims for motivations of their own which are malicious and not in any way associated with the facts.”

To one journalist at the press conference, who asserted that it wasn’t as if the PM was “fresh off the train from Adelaide,” Ms Gillard replied:
“How old are you? Thirty-two? Let me assure you — you’ll know a bit more when you’re 50 than you do now.”

The Hoopla contacted a number of women who attained the highest levels of leadership in Australian politics for comment; here’s what they had to say:

Kerry Chikarovski, former Liberal leader of the NSW Opposition:  
“During my time as Leader of the Opposition I fronted more than one difficult press conference.

“What the public don’t understand is the sometimes almost vitriolic attacks by the media can be very personal and over the top.

“People expect politicians to be able to take the pressure but often don’t realise that the intensity of the scrutiny can be almost overwhelming.”

Natasha Stott Despoja. Former leader of the Australian Democrats.
“Of course, there are gender overtones in the criticism and attacks levelled at the Prime Minister.

“I am glad she has put a name and words to the behaviour to which she is so often subjected. A lot of what she has experienced is misogynist and it is time she denounced it as such.

“Who would be a figure in public life these days? Unsubstantiated allegations in the media and free-flowing blog comments do not make public service, in particular politics and political leadership, an attractive choice.

Kerry Chikarovski, Natasha Stott Despoja and Prof Cheryl Kernot

Professor Cheryl Kernot, former leader of the Democrats and Labor MP:
“Julia Gillard’s press conference was courageous and competent; she did not seek the cover of parliamentary privilege but fronted a room containing a number of (predominantly male) journalists who are running a vicious agenda aimed at her “character”; self-important little people convincing themselves they are acting in the “public interest”.  And she answered their questions for well over an hour.

“What’s a legitimate public interest story? Rumours relating to an error of judgement in not ‘opening’ a file on pro bono work for a union 17 years ago; or falling out with some partner colleagues; or falling in love with someone who deceived you?

“I don’t think so.

“Not when the questions have been answered and refuted on several occasions over many years and when the timing and the motives for revisiting them are nakedly political and overlaid with sexism. 

“Can we go back and re-examine all the details of Tony Abbott’s pre-marital sex life? Given his strict Catholic values, is that not equally as illuminating about his “character” even 30 years on?

“What’s particularly alarming, I think, is that having said she wouldn’t dignify the comments being made even a PM was eventually hounded by the press gallery herd to respond.

“An unelected, largely unaccountable, often self-righteous bunch of people – many of whose own lives of 20 years ago wouldn’t withstand detailed scrutiny – have more power in setting the agenda of what matters to our nation than those who are elected.

“This IS a serious problem for Australian democracy … and supplements, in the most damaging way the cowardly, abusive, anonymity infecting our social media. Everyone – individuals and societies – needs boundaries.

“It’s time to set some and not be blackmailed by the usual default response of ‘threats to freedom of speech’.”

(This story was originally published in The Hoopla and has been republished with permission.)  
Recent articles by
Australia's Family Court system failing to protect children

Six years of fighting Family Court battles to try and protect her son from abuse ...  
CQ University staff denied vote on pay-cut option ahead of massive job losses

Central Queensland University (CQU) Vice-Chancellor Professor Nick Klomp is ...  
To the CQ University Vice-Chancellor: Save our jobs and not just yours

An anonymous group of academics from Central Queensland University has voiced ...  
Join the conversation
comments powered by Disqus

Support IAIndependent Australia

Subscribe to IA and investigate Australia today.

Close Subscribe Donate