Politics

The Pacific Solution didn’t work before and it won’t work now

By | | comments |

Despite another asylum seeker boat tragedy off Christmas Island today, Tony Abbott continues to offer Nauru as the solution and reject other options. John Menadue from the Centre for Policy Development, however, says re-opening Nauru is not the solution — and gives facts, rather than rhetoric, to explain why.



One-liners derived from focus groups and dog-whistling don’t add up to an acceptable refugee policy. But that is what the Coalition offers:

‘Stop the boats … turn them back to Indonesia … take the boat people to Nauru’.

It is important to examine carefully the so-called Pacific solution that Tony Abbott gives us as one-liners. The cost of Nauru in the 2000s was extremely high, both for the people imprisoned and the taxpayer, with minimal benefits to Australia. It cannot be part of a regional arrangement. In any event, Nauru and the Pacific Solution cannot be repeated. That is the clear view of the Department of Immigration and Citizenship (DIAC) and all agencies advising the government in this area.

Consider the following:

  • The total number of asylum seekers declined after the peak in 2001. This occurred not just for Australia but for all major refugee receiving countries. As the Secretary of DIAC told the Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee of the Senate of 17 October 2001, page 29, ‘Given the events of September 11 [2001] and its aftermath, there was a significant return of over two million refugees to Afghanistan’. This process of refugees returning to Afghanistan was assisted by peacekeepers in Afghanistan in 2002. Not surprisingly the refugee flows to Australia fell considerably after 2001.

Recent articles by admin
Essential skills every search specialist should master

In the ever-evolving landscape of digital marketing, search specialists play a ...  
7 practical tips for a stress-free house move

The thought of moving house is exciting. But the act of doing so might not be as ...  
​​What actually goes wrong in commercial construction projects, according to Carlyon Ward

Most construction disputes don’t start on-site. They start in the contract.  
Join the conversation
comments powered by Disqus

Support Fearless Journalism

If you got something from this article, please consider making a one-off donation to support fearless journalism.

Single Donation

$

Support IAIndependent Australia

Subscribe to IA and investigate Australia today.

Close Subscribe Donate