Seven reasons why lavishing a $1 billion subsidy on Adani is a truly inane idea

By | | comments |

Michael West exposes the sheer WTFness of the Federal Government stumping up Adani's dud coal mine with a $1 billion taxpayer subsidy. 

THE LATEST brainwave from the Federal Government is to lavish a $1 billion taxpayer subsidy on a foreign billionaire to build the world’s biggest new brown coal mine.

Seven reasons why this is a breathtakingly inane idea:

1. Sheer white-elephantness

  • The project’s bankers have long fled the scene.
  • Thermal coal is in structural decline.
  • The economics don’t stack up.

2. Tax: Forget it

Adani has been raking in $150 million of earnings (EBITDA) a year from its coal-port, but paid tax in only one year out of six and very little at that.

The proposed Federal loan is likely to be routed through another structure though – Adani Rail and Infrastructure – owned by an entity in the tax haven of Singapore, whose ultimate parent is a personal Adani family company in the Cayman Islands.

Again, forget tax.

3. Jobs: Under-delivery

Adani’s own admitted jobs number for Carmichael is 1,464. If that same $1 billion of taxpayers’ subsidy was to finance a solar project, it would create 9,000 construction jobs.

4. Water concessions

Coal mining is notoriously water intensive. Another subsidy flung Adani’s way is the recent water concession by the State Government. Queensland doesn’t charge miners for water and Adani’s Carmichael mega-mine will be draining the bores at precisely the same time the farmers need the water most.

5. “But this is a common-use facility!”: No it’s not

The NAIF proposal is for a “standard-gauge” rail-line compared with the state’s other “narrow-gauge” rail-lines, which are inter-connected.

This is a stand-alone thing, a stranded asset, a true white elephant.

6. “This is a nation building exercise. GVK will benefit too”: No, it’s not, and no they won’t

GVK has a market cap of $US130 million, debts of $US3 billion and still owes Gina Rinehart $560 million before it even begins to contemplate project finance.

7. “The project will help the poor of India”: Not at all

It will help poison the poor of India and cement Australia’s reputation alongside Donald Trump’s regime as the bogans, sans pareille, of world climate policy. Carmichael coal is low-energy, high-ash — not efficient, but highly damaging for the environment.

Meantime, Indian Energy Minister Piyush Goyal continues to reiterate his nation’s commitment to an aggressive solar roll-out and to cease seaborne thermal coal imports by 2020. He is on track to achieve this.

There is little flesh around the proposal. Apart from a leak to Rupert Murdoch’s Courier Mail newspaper – glowing coverage by one billionaire tax scoundrel and fossil-fuel champion for another – not much more has been said.

This article was originally published on michaelwest.com.au and has been reproduced with permission. You can follow Michael on Twitter @MichaelWestBiz.

Monthly Donation


Single Donation


Not a subscriber? Become one for for just $5.
Recent articles by Michael West
Treasury hides corporate welfare data to boost Government attacks on poor

In its Christmas-time attacks on the old, poor, needy and sick, the Government ...  
Matt Canavan calls for taxpayers to fund corporate gas exploration

Matt Canavan now wants public money for gas exploration in South East Australia as ...  
Budget 2017: The bank levy, leaks and insider trades

Leaked news of a budget bank levy wiped $14 billion from the banking sector in one ...  
Join the conversation
comments powered by Disqus

Support IAIndependent Australia

Subscribe to IA and investigate Australia today.

Close Subscribe Donate