The winter season added to the severity of the COVID-19 pandemic in NSW, which was already mismanaged by the Liberal Government, writes Dr Lee Duffield.
THE DEATHS OF 360 people in News South Wales during the 2021 winter lockdown should have put an end to over-optimistic ideas about handling COVID-19.
Before that, the state’s 18-month death toll had been 54, with much cocky assurance it had found a way to put the economy first and get away with that fairly painlessly. Then winter saw Australia’s heaviest impacts of the COVID-19 epidemic shift to NSW during the period between the start of lockdown in mid-June and the beginning of October.
On 5 October, after former NSW Premier Gladys Berejiklian fell on her sword, her successor, Dominic Perrottet, signalled little change in priorities. An awkward and ideologically-driven young man from the Right-wing, he said COVID-19 might be bad, but easing up on business activity would be worse.
Who has all the answers?
The state most reluctant to impose disease quarantines and most insistent on prioritising “normal” business opening struggled to contain mounting infections, which rose to 1,600 daily in mid-September — now subsided to half that level. Management became focused on a drive to get the population vaccinated with high rates of success. Thousands responded, more than 66% of persons over 16 now “double dosed”.
The winter season produced a clear pattern for Australia, that the two big clusters of population – Sydney and Melbourne – were the places not to be. Mortality figures told a story with over 1,200 persons lost in the two larger states, against the six other states and territories each registering mostly just single-digit losses for a shared total of 36 deaths up to October.
Victoria in the winter followed the same strategy as NSW: deploy a lockdown to dampen the growth in infections and incidence of deaths while pushing hard on mass vaccination — the main hope for bringing the epidemic under some sort of control.
Victoria up to June this year had registered 820 deaths. That was mostly the winter crisis of 2020, which saw fatal outbreaks from hotel quarantine and penetration of the disease into aged care centres, only contained through prolonged hardship lockdown restrictions.
In 2021, the Government of Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews moved quicker and harder than New South Wales on lockdown. It still struggled to hold down the rates of infection, seeing them grow and overtake the figures for NSW during September, but lives were saved — the number of deaths during the winter in Victoria this time was contained at under 55.
If there was agreement on a broad public health strategy against the virus, the political conflicts generated by the State Government of New South Wales in alliance with Prime Minister Scott Morrison against the other Australian states remained to be quelled.
Given analysis, the position taken in Sydney comes over as more ideological and partisan than it was ever going to be founded on the advice of doctors and epidemiologists alone. It had elements of denialism, a trait of radical conservative thinking also encountered in the response to climate change, suggesting the pandemic could mostly be ignored. Why spoil a beautiful life by going into lockdown — better to countenance some partying on the beaches. The disruption and loss of production caused by the epidemic were correctly understood as a deadly threat to the neoliberal project most contemporary right-wing politicians have staked their careers on.
The priority was to keep the “system” going; the economic system, prioritising money values and over-production ahead of the environment and even public health. It ignored one key reality: the enemy was a vicious disease and if the population attempted to go to work as usual, the disease would strike, undermining production anyway. Much as it goes against the neoliberal grain, getting more and more wealth might need to be put aside in favour of protecting public health.
Gladys Berejiklian set out an ambitiously sophisticated scheme of localised half-lockdowns, purportedly pinpointing the outbreaks. Even when crisis erupted in the winter, the “lockdown” was full of loopholes. Sydney people with weekenders on the southern and northern coasts were allowed to go there freely, variously taking infections with them.
The program was backed up with an insistent calling of the narrative using highly sympathetic media — News Corp papers, Sky News, 2GB. The Premier would proclaim optimistic deadlines for the end of outbreaks or achievement of testing, which would not be achieved but be replaced by new deadlines. It might have seemed politically expedient to tell the public not to worry, though the public would not always buy the story as told.
Members of the public actually moved ahead of their government in observing sensible measures, flooding into testing centres whenever set up and when vaccines finally became available, taking children to ensure they were getting some protection.
Pre-crisis, up to June 2021, Ms Berejiklian became stridently Party-political and belligerent about how successful she had been. While Victoria struggled with the savage outbreak of COVID-19 in mid-2020, she denounced the long lockdown there as state cruelty, ignoring any notion of it as a cruel necessity. She reportedly told the Liberal Party Federal Council in May, a few weeks before Sydney’s major outbreak, the lockdowns were finished in NSW.
She tried to intervene in the Queensland State Election, attacking the Government there for closing the border to holiday-makers from NSW. It was put over as Labor Government attacking small business, as against a virus wanting to attack a population.
In a 2GB interview, Berejiklian said:
“I'm just so upset and frustrated as to why the border's been in place for so long.”
What gold standard is that?
This was backed up, opportunistically, rashly, even unthinkingly by Scott Morrison, famously declaring New South Wales the “gold standard” for COVID-19 management. There should be no panic, he said, no anxiety about slow action by his government getting in stocks for vaccinations. “It's not a race,” he declared. “It's not a competition.”
When crisis struck in June, he was challenged over diverting extra supplies of vaccines to New South Wales, earmarked to meet urgent needs in other places; and over an imbalance in funding for business supports, then backed off to make up and avoid the flak. Likewise was an overnight conversion to urgent action on vaccines, which at once turned into a high priority — a race.
On the matter of vaccinations, he might need to be watched because of the priority placed on “opening up” communities and opening Australia to the world, through ending lockdowns once high levels of vaccination are reached. This is not a particularly numerate man. Criteria he mentions (70% then 80% of the population over 16 double-vaccinated) should be carefully scrutinised against any sleight of hand — for example, kind of letting people think 70% of over-16s was just about the same as 80% of everybody.
COVID struck hard last June — what comes next?
When COVID-19 struck hard, it was worst in crowded households and among the outdoor workforce based in “ethnic” suburbs across Sydney’s southwest — highly difficult territory for prevention campaigns and health services already under stress.
Ms Berejlikian had two responses: firstly, to say that it was entirely the fault of the virus by suddenly arriving in the form of a new strain – Delta – which was more infectious and disrespectful of the easy-as-she-goes, neoliberal system she had put in place. Secondly, New South Wales would open up anyway, once vaccination targets were met, even where rates of infection – and presumably deaths and severe strain on the hospitals – might be continuing high.
There was also a third point for the disapproved-of other states: even if continuing relatively pandemic-free, they and their publics would be made to follow the “leadership” of her government and that of Scott Morrison in opening up, like it or not — part of a campaign also by Federal Liberals. Public debate ensued about whether such an ultimatum actually was sanctioned by the so-called COVID-19 exit plan initialled by the state and federal governments at a National Cabinet meeting, whether the High Court would agree and so on.
A common-sense rejoinder is crying out for attention here. It was open to the governments of New South Wales and Australia to expect that something like the Delta strain was coming and to prepare for it. Any educated adult would have heard how viruses change, as with seasonal flu viruses, where you need a new injection every year. Persons running governments had a duty to get ready for that.
Surely this virus will change again. There is talk of an Epsilon strain that is said to be resistant to existing vaccines. What about Zeta, Eta, Theta or even an Omega later on, imaginable as a COVID-19 variant very different to the original, that might revel in warm sunny days and target children? Is it not wise to relegate even an obstinately-held political ideology to a back seat, the better to prepare for a mortal threat to your species?
Dr Lee Duffield is a former ABC foreign correspondent, political journalist and academic.
- The vaccination saga: Infections, hesitancy and inequality
- Fake vaccine passports making the pandemic more difficult
- Government needs to rethink its COVID-19 strategy
- Melbourne anti-lockdown protests are a disorganised mess
- Like the U.S., Australians angry about COVID mismanagement
Support independent journalism Subscribe to IA.